Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

SUPPORT FOR LIFE

SUPPORT FOR LIFE (Texas) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $57,775 to it, the largest being RUGELEY FERGUSON FOUNDATION ($25,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$181k
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$58k
Net assets
$34k
2/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 19%
01What it does

What Support for Life does

Mission

Raise funds for scholarships and support other local 501C3 organizations

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Program

  1. Conducted a charity dove hunt was the sole source of funds raised

    $58,473 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $58,473.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($52k) Expenses 100 ($81k) Net assets 100 ($65k)2020 Revenue 74 ($38k) Expenses 70 ($57k) Net assets 109 ($71k)2021 Revenue 500 ($258k) Expenses 299 ($241k) Net assets 97 ($63k)2022 Revenue 335 ($172k) Expenses 257 ($207k) Net assets 9 ($6k)2023 Revenue 232 ($120k) Expenses 88 ($71k) Net assets 84 ($55k)2024 Revenue 246 ($127k) Expenses 152 ($122k) Net assets 91 ($59k)2025 Revenue 352 ($181k) Expenses 287 ($231k) Net assets 52 ($34k)
2019202020212022202320242025
Revenue (352)Expenses (287)Net assets (52)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $88k to $30k (−65%).

$65k
$71k
$88k
$30k
$79k
$84k
$34k
2019202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

0% of SUPPORT FOR LIFE’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (82% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 14,893 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

−$29k
’19
−$19k
’20
$17k
’21
−$35k
’22
$49k
’23
$4k
’24
−$50k
’25
8.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

2021202220232024
Listed4444
Joined·+0+0+0
No longer listed·000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $10k → $6k.

2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 38% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SUPPORT FOR LIFE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SUPPORT FOR LIFE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 89%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

38% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SUPPORT FOR LIFE.

43%
largest funder
89%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 84% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of SUPPORT FOR LIFE's grant income comes from Texas funders.

TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’19
’21
’22
’23
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $22k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

SUPPORT FOR LIFE has grown faster than three-quarters of the 7,883 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−27% · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)23% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,883 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like SUPPORT FOR LIFE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SUPPORT FOR LIFE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SUPPORT FOR LIFE?
SUPPORT FOR LIFE (Texas) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $57,775 to it, the largest being RUGELEY FERGUSON FOUNDATION ($25,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does SUPPORT FOR LIFE have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $57,775 in grants to SUPPORT FOR LIFE, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SUPPORT FOR LIFE?
RUGELEY FERGUSON FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $25,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SUPPORT FOR LIFE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Support for Life →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing