Nebraska · Nonprofit
SUPERIOR HISTORIC RE-DEVELOPMENT IN
SUPERIOR HISTORIC RE-DEVELOPMENT IN (Nebraska) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $60,285 to it, the largest being ROBERT B DAUGHERTY FOUNDATION ($30,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2023
- $68k
- Funders on record
- 3
- Grants received
- $60k
- Net assets
- $547k
What Superior Historic Re-Development In does
Mission
Promote historic preservation and provide a space for community events and activities.
As stated on its FY2023 Form 990.
Program
Promote historic preservation and provide a space for community events and activities.
$41,668 spent100% of program spending
The program described on its FY2023 Form 990. Program spending in total: $41,668.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2018 to 2019, from $420k to $432k (+3%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2018 12% · 2019 2%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
88% of SUPERIOR HISTORIC RE-DEVELOPMENT IN’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (78% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Who funds it, year by year
2022 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $59k → $1k.
1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 48% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of SUPERIOR HISTORIC RE-DEVELOPMENT IN’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
SUPERIOR HISTORIC RE-DEVELOPMENT IN leans on a few funders — its largest provides 50% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
48% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SUPERIOR HISTORIC RE-DEVELOPMENT IN.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 51% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of SUPERIOR HISTORIC RE-DEVELOPMENT IN's grant income comes from Nebraska funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $29k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
SUPERIOR HISTORIC RE-DEVELOPMENT IN is better cushioned than half of the 14,279 arts & culture nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 14,279 arts & culture nonprofits under $100k, FY2023
Government funding SUPERIOR HISTORIC RE-DEVELOPMENT IN receives
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $113k on record.
- Department of Agriculture$113k
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Organizations like SUPERIOR HISTORIC RE-DEVELOPMENT IN
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Nebraska
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
62% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
89%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SUPERIOR HISTORIC RE-DEVELOPMENT IN: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds SUPERIOR HISTORIC RE-DEVELOPMENT IN?
- SUPERIOR HISTORIC RE-DEVELOPMENT IN (Nebraska) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $60,285 to it, the largest being ROBERT B DAUGHERTY FOUNDATION ($30,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does SUPERIOR HISTORIC RE-DEVELOPMENT IN have?
- IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $60,285 in grants to SUPERIOR HISTORIC RE-DEVELOPMENT IN.
- Who is the largest funder of SUPERIOR HISTORIC RE-DEVELOPMENT IN?
- ROBERT B DAUGHERTY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $30,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like SUPERIOR HISTORIC RE-DEVELOPMENT IN find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Nebraska. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Superior Historic Re-Development In →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2018–2023), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing