Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

California · Nonprofit

SUMMIT LEADERSHIP - HIGH DESERT

SUMMIT LEADERSHIP - HIGH DESERT (California) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $296 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($296). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$5.7M
Revenue FY2025
1
Funders on record
$296
Grants received
$2.2M
Net assets
1/1 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%

Against its field

SUMMIT LEADERSHIP - HIGH DESERT has grown faster than half of the 9,072 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin0% · below the median
Months of reserve3.5mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)16% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,072 education nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.8M) Expenses 100 ($2.5M) Net assets 100 ($617k)2018 Revenue 296 ($5.3M) Expenses 190 ($4.7M) Net assets 197 ($1.2M)2019 Revenue 241 ($4.3M) Expenses 174 ($4.3M) Net assets 196 ($1.2M)2020 Revenue 231 ($4.1M) Expenses 163 ($4.0M) Net assets 212 ($1.3M)2021 Revenue 282 ($5.0M) Expenses 169 ($4.2M) Net assets 350 ($2.2M)2022 Revenue 250 ($4.5M) Expenses 180 ($4.5M) Net assets 352 ($2.2M)2023 Revenue 256 ($4.6M) Expenses 185 ($4.6M) Net assets 351 ($2.2M)2024 Revenue 294 ($5.3M) Expenses 212 ($5.3M) Net assets 353 ($2.2M)2025 Revenue 318 ($5.7M) Expenses 229 ($5.7M) Net assets 355 ($2.2M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (318)Expenses (229)Net assets (355)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 137% · 2018 96% · 2019 98% · 2020 98% · 2021 100% · 2022 97% · 2023 98% · 2024 99% · 2025 99%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of SUMMIT LEADERSHIP - HIGH DESERT’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (48% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,312 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$690k
17
$597k
18
$3k
19
$98k
20
$850k
21
$14k
22
$416
23
$11k
24
$10k
25
3.5
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $108 → $27.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
total
funders
1
1
1
1

1 of 1 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SUMMIT LEADERSHIP - HIGH DESERT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of SUMMIT LEADERSHIP - HIGH DESERT's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $296 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding SUMMIT LEADERSHIP - HIGH DESERT receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $177k on record.

Federal$177k
grants $177kcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Top agencies
  • Department of Education$177k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like SUMMIT LEADERSHIP - HIGH DESERT

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

89% of spending goes to programs.

Program 89%Management 11%Fundraising 0%

Governance

4
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SUMMIT LEADERSHIP - HIGH DESERT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SUMMIT LEADERSHIP - HIGH DESERT?
SUMMIT LEADERSHIP - HIGH DESERT (California) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $296 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($296). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does SUMMIT LEADERSHIP - HIGH DESERT have?
IRS filings report 1 organization giving $296 in grants to SUMMIT LEADERSHIP - HIGH DESERT, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SUMMIT LEADERSHIP - HIGH DESERT?
AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $296 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SUMMIT LEADERSHIP - HIGH DESERT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 1funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing