Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

California · Nonprofit

STOCKTON LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY

STOCKTON LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $9,154 to it, the largest being Stockton Police Officers Association ($5,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$71k
Revenue FY2025
3
Funders on record
$9k
Grants received
$43k
Net assets
1/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 6%

Against its field

STOCKTON LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY has grown faster than half of the 987 crime & legal nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−49% · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−3% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 987 crime & legal nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($90k) Expenses 100 ($70k) Net assets 100 ($53k)2018 Revenue 83 ($75k) Expenses 108 ($76k) Net assets 97 ($52k)2019 Revenue 89 ($80k) Expenses 112 ($78k) Net assets 102 ($54k)2020 Revenue 69 ($62k) Expenses 93 ($65k) Net assets 97 ($51k)2021 Revenue 97 ($87k) Expenses 94 ($65k) Net assets 138 ($73k)2022 Revenue 134 ($121k) Expenses 141 ($99k) Net assets 180 ($95k)2023 Revenue 114 ($103k) Expenses 162 ($113k) Net assets 160 ($85k)2024 Revenue 120 ($108k) Expenses 164 ($115k) Net assets 148 ($78k)2025 Revenue 79 ($71k) Expenses 152 ($106k) Net assets 82 ($43k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (79)Expenses (152)Net assets (82)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

72% of STOCKTON LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (99% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,016 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$20k
17
$1k
18
$2k
19
$3k
20
$22k
21
$22k
22
$10k
23
$6k
24
$35k
25
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $4k → $43.

1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)2% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of STOCKTON LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

STOCKTON LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 55% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

56% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund STOCKTON LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY.

55%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 99% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

56% of STOCKTON LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY's grant income comes from California funders.

OR
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
21
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $154 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like STOCKTON LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for STOCKTON LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds STOCKTON LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY?
STOCKTON LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $9,154 to it, the largest being Stockton Police Officers Association ($5,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does STOCKTON LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $9,154 in grants to STOCKTON LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of STOCKTON LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY?
Stockton Police Officers Association is the largest funder on record, with $5,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like STOCKTON LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing