Missouri · Nonprofit
ST LOUIS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC
ST LOUIS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC (Missouri) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $10,516 to it, the largest being VETERANS UNITED FOUNDATION ($10,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
ST LOUIS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC's funding has concentrated — grant income rose while the number of funders held roughly flat.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 12,886 recreation & sports nonprofits under $100k, FY2023
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Regional Cultural and Performing Arts Development Commissionlocalportfolio match
- Heart of Missouri United Way Incshared funders
- Leon and Mary Strauss Charitable Foundationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
17% of ST LOUIS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (39% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.
Who funds it, year by year
2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $78 → $110.
1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 5% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of ST LOUIS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
ST LOUIS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 95% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ST LOUIS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 98% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of ST LOUIS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC's grant income comes from Missouri funders.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $516 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Regional Cultural and Performing Arts Development Commissionlocalportfolio matchMO · funds 134 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- Heart of Missouri United Way Incshared fundersMO · backs 26 organizations that share your funders
- Leon and Mary Strauss Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Robert J Trulaske Jr Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- William a Kerr Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Civic Progress Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Missouri Humanities Councilportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Blues for Kidsportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Em Burger Memorial Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Christine Gempp Love Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ameren Charitable Trust (Union Electricportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- S & S Campbell Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like ST LOUIS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Missouri
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
97%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ST LOUIS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds ST LOUIS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC?
- ST LOUIS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC (Missouri) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $10,516 to it, the largest being VETERANS UNITED FOUNDATION ($10,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does ST LOUIS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC have?
- IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $10,516 in grants to ST LOUIS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of ST LOUIS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC?
- VETERANS UNITED FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $10,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like ST LOUIS RECREATION DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Missouri. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2019–2023), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing