Skip to content

Missouri · Nonprofit

SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY

SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY (Missouri) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $99,538 to it, the largest being HISTORY OF SCIENCE SOCIETY INC ($56,183). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$462k
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$100k
Net assets
$4.7M
3/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 8%
01What it does

What Society for the History of Technology does

Mission

The Society for the History of Technology is dedicated to the historical study of technology and its relations with politics, economics, labor, business, the environment, public policy, science, and the arts.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Published four issues of our academic journal (regular since the 1950s), containing the latest peer-reviewed excellent scholarship in our field, plus book reviews, essays, and visual material.

    $303,121 spent$127,779 earned by the program
    59% of program spending
  2. Held second in-person annual meeting since the COVID pandemic, organizing and running almost four days of meetings in Los Angeles, where members presented research papers and discussed teaching, where publishers displayed recent publications in our field and met potential authors, where students and new scholars met with senior scholars and got feedback on their work.

    $161,520 spent$114,429 earned by the program
    32% of program spending
  3. Selected winners of SHOT's fourteen regular awards and fellowships for excellence in research; awarded several dozen travel grants to US and international scholars to support their presenting research at our conference; hosted other programs to encourage and recognize good work in our discipline

    $45,633 spentof which $35,049 as grants
    9% of program spending
  4. Other program services, not described on the e-filed return.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $510,274.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($292k) Expenses 100 ($205k) Net assets 100 ($1.9M)2018 Revenue 88 ($257k) Expenses 134 ($276k) Net assets 98 ($1.8M)2020 Revenue 97 ($282k) Expenses 162 ($334k) Net assets 213 ($4.0M)2021 Revenue 168 ($491k) Expenses 141 ($289k) Net assets 245 ($4.6M)2022 Revenue 124 ($363k) Expenses 191 ($392k) Net assets 199 ($3.7M)2023 Revenue 165 ($482k) Expenses 260 ($534k) Net assets 220 ($4.1M)2024 Revenue 158 ($462k) Expenses 174 ($358k) Net assets 250 ($4.7M)
2017201820202021202220232024
Revenue (158)Expenses (174)Net assets (250)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $4.6M to $3.8M (−18%).

$1.9M
$1.8M
$4.0M
$4.6M
$3.8M
$4.2M
$4.7M
2017201820202021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$87k
’17
−$18k
’18
−$51k
’20
$202k
’21
−$29k
’22
−$53k
’23
$104k
’24
3.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

2017201820202021202220232024
Listed18171416161615
Joined·+10·+10+5+0+3
No longer listed·11·8504
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $9k → $23k.

Funder
'17
'18
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
1

2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 25% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $8k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest The D Kim Foundation for the History of Science and Technology in East Asia Inc). These are real filings, and they are not money SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY raised.

From the IRS filings of SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 56% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY.

56%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 54% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Missouri, across 2 states in all.

PA
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’20
’23
Missouri out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $25k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Missouri

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

94% of spending goes to programs.

Program 94%Management 6%Fundraising 0%

Governance

15
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

74%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY?
SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY (Missouri) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $99,538 to it, the largest being HISTORY OF SCIENCE SOCIETY INC ($56,183). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $99,538 in grants to SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY?
HISTORY OF SCIENCE SOCIETY INC is the largest funder on record, with $56,183 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SOCIETY FOR THE HISTORY OF TECHNOLOGY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Missouri. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Society for the History of Technology →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing