Skip to content

Florida · Nonprofit

Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis

Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis (Florida) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $99 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($99). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$299k
Funders on record
1
Grants received
$99
Net assets
$525k
1/1 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis does

Mission

The Association is dedicated to the advancement, exchange of ideas, and research related to benefit-cost analysis, cost effectiveness analysis, risk-benefit analysis, applied welfare economic analysis, and damage assessment.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Conference workshops; as an international group of practitioners, academics, and others who are working to improve the theory and application of the tools and benefit cost analysis (BCA), SBCA welcomes submissions that support the ehnanced use of such analysis to promote evidence based decision making. BCA is defined broadly, including cost analysis, cost effectiviness analysis, risk-benefit analysis, applied welfare economics, damange assessment and other methods. The conference welcomes submissions on topics closely related to BCA such as non-market evaluation, discounting, equity, social policy, regulation, implementation of BCA, etc and application to any public policy area, such as environment, transport, health, energy etc. are encourged.

    $72,811 spent$144,140 earned by the program
    88% of program spending
  2. Journal - as part of the SBCA membership benefits, all SBCA members are given a free subscription to the journal of benefit cost analysis (JBCA). JBCA is the only journal devoted exclusively to benefit-cost analysis, the leading evidence based anaytical method for determining if the consequences of specific public actions make society better off overall. JBCA publishes theory, empirical analysis, case studies, and techniques. Applications include social programs related to education, crime, health, poverty, labor and housing as well as regulations and projects related to the environment, natural resources, transportation, safety, and security. The interdisciplinary nature, with contributions from a wide range of disciplines and areas of public policy, is unique. JBCAs mission is to expand the use of serious, state of the art BCA by individuals and groups who make public policy decisions, those who advise, and those who implement the projects, programs, and policies. By serving as a bridge, the JBCA serves an important role that few other journals provide.

    $10,256 spent$18,303 earned by the program
    12% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $83,067.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($217k) Expenses 100 ($197k) Net assets 100 ($160k)2018 Revenue 179 ($390k) Expenses 120 ($236k) Net assets 196 ($313k)2019 Revenue 126 ($274k) Expenses 158 ($311k) Net assets 143 ($228k)2020 Revenue 53 ($115k) Expenses 117 ($232k) Net assets 70 ($112k)2021 Revenue 125 ($272k) Expenses 74 ($146k) Net assets 148 ($237k)2022 Revenue 127 ($277k) Expenses 69 ($137k) Net assets 236 ($377k)2023 Revenue 134 ($290k) Expenses 115 ($227k) Net assets 276 ($441k)2024 Revenue 138 ($299k) Expenses 109 ($215k) Net assets 328 ($525k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (138)Expenses (109)Net assets (328)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $160k to $314k (+96%).

$160k
$314k
$347k
$223k
$315k
$414k
$521k
$564k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

13% of Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (57% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 24,946 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$20k
’17
$153k
’18
−$37k
’19
−$116k
’20
$126k
’21
$140k
’22
$63k
’23
$84k
’24
31
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Tonya Wade

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1515151515181616
Joined·+0+11+6+7+7+6+5
No longer listed·01167485
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2021: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $53 → $46.

Funder
'20
'21
total
funders
1
1

1 of 1 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $99 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 22,812 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin28% · top quartile
Months of reserve30.7mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)5% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 22,812 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Government funding Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $28k on record.

Federal$28k
grants $0contracts $28k
18
19
20
Top agencies
  • Department of Homeland Security$28k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Florida

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

39% of spending goes to programs.

Program 39%Management 61%Fundraising 0%

Governance

15
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis?
Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis (Florida) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $99 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($99). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis have?
IRS filings report 1 organization giving $99 in grants to Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis?
AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $99 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Florida. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Society for Benefit-Cost Analysis →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 1 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing