Skip to content

Maryland · Nonprofit

SOCIAL PERFORMANCE TASK FORCE INC

SOCIAL PERFORMANCE TASK FORCE INC (Maryland) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $328,558 to it, the largest being NEW VENTURE FUND ($200,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 61% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$1.3M
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$329k
Net assets
$1.7M
0/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 6%
01What it does

What Social Performance Task Force Inc does

Mission

To promote and support effective social performance management standards (universal standards for social performance management) throughout the global microfinance industry in order to create responsible and ethical business practices among financial service providers.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Setting and promoting standards:the universal standards for financial service providers were first launched in 2012 and updated in 2016. Sptf manages a technical review committee (trc) to follow a transparent and user-driven standard revision process based on the iseal code of good practice for setting social and environmental standards. The revised standards have been designed to keep pace with the financial sector industry's needs and provide new guidelines on responsible savings and insurance products, as well as delivery channels using digital services and agent models, all with an eye toward mitigating risk and creating benefits for clients. The universal standards also include new content on responsibility to the environment. The trc reviews the universal standards every 3 years. Sptf is in charge of gathering and processing all feedback received from the inclusive finance industry, as well as with the broader impact investment community. Manage effective communications - after releasing the universal standards in 2012, sptf developed several resources to help with their awareness and implementation, such as brief handouts, message manuals, the universal standards…

    $496,576 spent$274,217 earned by the program
    23% of program spending
  2. Assessing, improving, demonstrating:sptf has worked with one of its members, cerise, to develop a free assessment tool (called the spi4) that enables fsps to assess their social performance management practices against the universal standards. This tool allows fsps to understand their spm strengths and weaknesses and create an action plan for improvement. Sptf does not directly provide technical assistance to fsps because that would compete with its members. Rather, sptf works to make sure that the most updated trainings, resources, and tools are available to fsps and ta providers, and that they know how to use them. Sptf also conducts online trainings and provides free resources in several languages to help improve practices related to the universal standards.to advance work on demonstrating outcomes, the sptf runs the outcomes working group to develop guidelines both for investors and for fsps for measuring and managing outcomes as well as to create a list of common outcome indicators in the areas of poverty/housing/assets, business, and resilience.

    $1,634,023 spent
    75% of program spending
  3. Reporting & demonstrating:reporting on spm data helps the responsible inclusive finance sector be transparent, ensures the data is available to investors, and allows the industry to benchmark and analyze trends. Sptf plays a coordinating role in this activity as mix, cerise and the rating agencies conduct the vast majority of the direct work in collection of data. Sptf is managing discussion amongst these actors to consolidate this spm information onto a common data platform so that it is more accessible to users.

    $42,564 spent
    2% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,173,163.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.6M) Expenses 100 ($1.6M) Net assets 100 ($3.7M)2018 Revenue 151 ($3.9M) Expenses 107 ($1.7M) Net assets 157 ($5.8M)2019 Revenue 53 ($1.4M) Expenses 140 ($2.3M) Net assets 131 ($4.8M)2020 Revenue 5 ($142k) Expenses 150 ($2.4M) Net assets 76 ($2.8M)2021 Revenue 36 ($928k) Expenses 133 ($2.1M) Net assets 39 ($1.4M)2022 Revenue 198 ($5.2M) Expenses 132 ($2.1M) Net assets 122 ($4.5M)2023 Revenue 33 ($849k) Expenses 163 ($2.6M) Net assets 77 ($2.8M)2024 Revenue 50 ($1.3M) Expenses 142 ($2.3M) Net assets 46 ($1.7M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (50)Expenses (142)Net assets (46)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $1.7M to $5.1M (+197%).

$3.8M
$5.9M
$5.1M
$3.1M
$1.7M
$5.1M
$3.2M
$1.8M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 9%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

79% of SOCIAL PERFORMANCE TASK FORCE INC’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (61% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,434 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$995k
’17
$2.2M
’18
−$881k
’19
−$2.3M
’20
−$1.2M
’21
$3.0M
’22
−$1.8M
’23
−$1.0M
’24
4.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Laura Foose

Executive director

Board chair

Loic De Canniere

Chairman

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed2218181817161616
Joined·+5+2+6+1+0+5+1
No longer listed·9262151
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $75k → $54k.

Funder
'17
'22
'23
total
$54k
funders
1
1
1

1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 61% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SOCIAL PERFORMANCE TASK FORCE INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SOCIAL PERFORMANCE TASK FORCE INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 61% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

77% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SOCIAL PERFORMANCE TASK FORCE INC.

61%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

61% of SOCIAL PERFORMANCE TASK FORCE INC's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $129k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Maryland, across 2 states.

IL
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’23
Maryland out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $200k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

SOCIAL PERFORMANCE TASK FORCE INC's revenue fell 50% between 2017 and 2024.

Operating margin−77% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve4.3mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−10% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,203 community improvement nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like SOCIAL PERFORMANCE TASK FORCE INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Maryland

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

95% of spending goes to programs.

Program 95%Management 5%Fundraising 0%

Governance

14
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

54%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SOCIAL PERFORMANCE TASK FORCE INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SOCIAL PERFORMANCE TASK FORCE INC?
SOCIAL PERFORMANCE TASK FORCE INC (Maryland) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $328,558 to it, the largest being NEW VENTURE FUND ($200,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 61% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does SOCIAL PERFORMANCE TASK FORCE INC have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $328,558 in grants to SOCIAL PERFORMANCE TASK FORCE INC.
Who is the largest funder of SOCIAL PERFORMANCE TASK FORCE INC?
NEW VENTURE FUND is the largest funder on record, with $200,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SOCIAL PERFORMANCE TASK FORCE INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Maryland. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Social Performance Task Force →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing