Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

California · Nonprofit

SHERMAN THOMAS CHARTER SCHOOLS

SHERMAN THOMAS CHARTER SCHOOLS (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $472 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($472). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$6.2M
Revenue FY2025
2
Funders on record
$472
Grants received
$4.0M
Net assets
1/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%

Against its field

SHERMAN THOMAS CHARTER SCHOOLS is better cushioned than half of the 9,072 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin2% · below the median
Months of reserve7.9mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)9% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,072 education nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.0M) Expenses 100 ($2.9M) Net assets 100 ($563k)2018 Revenue 120 ($3.6M) Expenses 125 ($3.7M) Net assets 88 ($498k)2019 Revenue 132 ($4.0M) Expenses 126 ($3.7M) Net assets 139 ($782k)2020 Revenue 157 ($4.7M) Expenses 141 ($4.2M) Net assets 359 ($2.0M)2021 Revenue 152 ($4.6M) Expenses 138 ($4.1M) Net assets 451 ($2.5M)2022 Revenue 167 ($5.0M) Expenses 163 ($4.8M) Net assets 492 ($2.8M)2023 Revenue 216 ($6.5M) Expenses 187 ($5.5M) Net assets 665 ($3.7M)2024 Revenue 196 ($5.9M) Expenses 197 ($5.8M) Net assets 683 ($3.8M)2025 Revenue 204 ($6.2M) Expenses 204 ($6.0M) Net assets 709 ($4.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (204)Expenses (204)Net assets (709)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

0% of SHERMAN THOMAS CHARTER SCHOOLS’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (48% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,312 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$70k
17
$65k
18
$284k
19
$584k
20
$517k
21
$230k
22
$979k
23
$97k
24
$147k
25
7.9
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $90 → $101.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
total
funders
1
2
1
1

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SHERMAN THOMAS CHARTER SCHOOLS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 1 of 2 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of SHERMAN THOMAS CHARTER SCHOOLS's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $472 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like SHERMAN THOMAS CHARTER SCHOOLS

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

88% of spending goes to programs.

Program 88%Management 12%Fundraising 0%

Governance

6
board members
83%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SHERMAN THOMAS CHARTER SCHOOLS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SHERMAN THOMAS CHARTER SCHOOLS?
SHERMAN THOMAS CHARTER SCHOOLS (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $472 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($472). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does SHERMAN THOMAS CHARTER SCHOOLS have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $472 in grants to SHERMAN THOMAS CHARTER SCHOOLS, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SHERMAN THOMAS CHARTER SCHOOLS?
AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $472 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SHERMAN THOMAS CHARTER SCHOOLS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing