Skip to content

Wisconsin · Nonprofit

SHADOWS ON THE WOLF INC

SHADOWS ON THE WOLF INC (Wisconsin) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $17,345 to it, the largest being JAMES J AND ROSANNE C KELLER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ($17,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$190k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$17k
Net assets
$446k
2/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 7%
01What it does

What Shadows on the Wolf Inc does

Mission

The primary purpose of the corporation is to educate people about the lower wolf river ecosystem, including education with respect to land stewardship practices favorable to wildlife in terrestrial and aquatic systems; improvement of people's knolwledge and appreciation of wildlife and the wildlife in aquatic habitat within this ecosystem; to gather information about the wildlife data base in this ecosystemand to provide classes for people which are directed towards the safe and sane use of these god given resources. To that end, this corporation will participate in projects which pereptuate and foster the existing wildlife and fisheries habitat of the ecosystem and which promote the enjoyment and appreciaition of the same by current and future generations of all god's children.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Scholarships

    $8,000 spentof which $8,000 as grants
    5% of program spending
  2. Education & community grants

    $65,547 spent
    38% of program spending
  3. Program projects

    $69,234 spent
    40% of program spending
  4. Functional expenses for exempt purpose.

    $28,836 spent
    17% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $171,617.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($543k) Expenses 100 ($264k) Net assets 100 ($486k)2020 Revenue 12 ($64k) Expenses 49 ($129k) Net assets 86 ($420k)2021 Revenue 73 ($397k) Expenses 133 ($350k) Net assets 96 ($467k)2022 Revenue 23 ($122k) Expenses 42 ($110k) Net assets 99 ($480k)2023 Revenue 37 ($201k) Expenses 64 ($167k) Net assets 106 ($514k)2024 Revenue 15 ($80k) Expenses 61 ($161k) Net assets 89 ($433k)2025 Revenue 35 ($190k) Expenses 67 ($177k) Net assets 92 ($446k)
2019202020212022202320242025
Revenue (35)Expenses (67)Net assets (92)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $514k to $433k (−16%).

$486k
$420k
$467k
$480k
$514k
$433k
$446k
2019202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2019 86% · 2022 3% · 2023 0% · 2024 1%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

24% of SHADOWS ON THE WOLF INC’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,629 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$279k
’19
−$66k
’20
$47k
’21
$13k
’22
$34k
’23
−$81k
’24
$13k
’25
20
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

2019202020212022202320242025
Listed4444999
Joined·+2+1+2+6+1+0
No longer listed·212110
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $136 → $9k.

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 2% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SHADOWS ON THE WOLF INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SHADOWS ON THE WOLF INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 98% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

98%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 99% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of SHADOWS ON THE WOLF INC's grant income comes from Wisconsin funders.

WI

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’22
’23
Wisconsin out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $345 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

SHADOWS ON THE WOLF INC holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 2,433 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin7% · below the median
Months of reserve20.2mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−16% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,433 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like SHADOWS ON THE WOLF INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Wisconsin

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

97% of spending goes to programs.

Program 97%Management 3%Fundraising 0%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

53%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WI

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SHADOWS ON THE WOLF INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SHADOWS ON THE WOLF INC?
SHADOWS ON THE WOLF INC (Wisconsin) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $17,345 to it, the largest being JAMES J AND ROSANNE C KELLER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC ($17,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does SHADOWS ON THE WOLF INC have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $17,345 in grants to SHADOWS ON THE WOLF INC, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SHADOWS ON THE WOLF INC?
JAMES J AND ROSANNE C KELLER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $17,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SHADOWS ON THE WOLF INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Wisconsin. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Shadows on the Wolf →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing