Ohio · Nonprofit
SERVING OLDER ADULTS THROUGH CHANGING TI
SERVING OLDER ADULTS THROUGH CHANGING TI (Ohio) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $134,750 to it, the largest being United Way of Greater Cincinnati ($49,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
SERVING OLDER ADULTS THROUGH CHANGING TI runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 5,983 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 5,983 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- L & L Nippert Charitable Foundation Inc Attn Carter F Randolph Phdshared funderslocal
- Home Instead Charitiesportfolio match
- Meals on Wheels Americaportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2024 0% · 2025 89%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
94% of SERVING OLDER ADULTS THROUGH CHANGING TI’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $15k → $23k.
2 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 37% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of SERVING OLDER ADULTS THROUGH CHANGING TI’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
SERVING OLDER ADULTS THROUGH CHANGING TI leans on a few funders — its largest provides 36% of grant income and the top three 85%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
92% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SERVING OLDER ADULTS THROUGH CHANGING TI.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 53% · 2022 100% · 2023 98% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
88% of SERVING OLDER ADULTS THROUGH CHANGING TI's grant income comes from Ohio funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $50k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- L & L Nippert Charitable Foundation Inc Attn Carter F Randolph Phdshared funderslocalOH · backs 66 organizations that share your funders · funds 104 organizations near you
- Home Instead Charitiesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Meals on Wheels Americaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Detroit Area Agency on Agingportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Lutheran Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Trust Estate of George B Rileyshared fundersOH · backs 31 organizations that share your funders
- Northeast Missouri Area Agency on Agingportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Area Agency on Aging for North Floridaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Usagingportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Elderbridge Agency on Agingportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Areawide Aging Agencyportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Idaho Foodbank Warehouseportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like SERVING OLDER ADULTS THROUGH CHANGING TI
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Ohio
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
72% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SERVING OLDER ADULTS THROUGH CHANGING TI: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds SERVING OLDER ADULTS THROUGH CHANGING TI?
- SERVING OLDER ADULTS THROUGH CHANGING TI (Ohio) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $134,750 to it, the largest being United Way of Greater Cincinnati ($49,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does SERVING OLDER ADULTS THROUGH CHANGING TI have?
- IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $134,750 in grants to SERVING OLDER ADULTS THROUGH CHANGING TI, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of SERVING OLDER ADULTS THROUGH CHANGING TI?
- United Way of Greater Cincinnati is the largest funder on record, with $49,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like SERVING OLDER ADULTS THROUGH CHANGING TI find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ohio. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing