Skip to content
Plinth
FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Washington · Nonprofit

SEATTLE 2030 DISTRICT

SEATTLE 2030 DISTRICT (Washington) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $334,115 to it, the largest being THE BULLITT FOUNDATION ($322,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$471k
Revenue FY2024
4
Funders on record
$334k
Grants received
$47k
Net assets
4/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 27%

Against its field

SEATTLE 2030 DISTRICT runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 12,796 religion nonprofits its size.

Operating margin9% · above the median
Months of reserve1.5mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)5% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 12,796 religion nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($327k) Expenses 100 ($410k) Net assets 100 ($21k)2018 Revenue 151 ($492k) Expenses 79 ($323k) Net assets 903 ($190k)2019 Revenue 71 ($231k) Expenses 74 ($304k) Net assets 556 ($117k)2020 Revenue 100 ($326k) Expenses 85 ($350k) Net assets 444 ($93k)2021 Revenue 108 ($352k) Expenses 75 ($306k) Net assets 666 ($140k)2022 Revenue 69 ($226k) Expenses 76 ($313k) Net assets 251 ($53k)2023 Revenue 78 ($255k) Expenses 74 ($303k) Net assets 26 ($5k)2024 Revenue 144 ($471k) Expenses 105 ($429k) Net assets 225 ($47k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (144)Expenses (105)Net assets (225)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 13% · 2018 18% · 2019 22% · 2020 6% · 2021 36% · 2022 19% · 2023 3% · 2024 29%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

122% of SEATTLE 2030 DISTRICT’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 15,235 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$83k
17
$169k
18
$73k
19
$24k
20
$47k
21
$87k
22
$47k
23
$42k
24
1.5
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $60k → $50k.

Funder
'17
'18
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
1
1
2
2
3
2
1
1

1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SEATTLE 2030 DISTRICT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SEATTLE 2030 DISTRICT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 96% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

96%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 60% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of SEATTLE 2030 DISTRICT's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
20
21
22
23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $115 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 387 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like SEATTLE 2030 DISTRICT

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

60% of spending goes to programs.

Program 60%Management 25%Fundraising 15%

Governance

16
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

84%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SEATTLE 2030 DISTRICT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SEATTLE 2030 DISTRICT?
SEATTLE 2030 DISTRICT (Washington) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $334,115 to it, the largest being THE BULLITT FOUNDATION ($322,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does SEATTLE 2030 DISTRICT have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $334,115 in grants to SEATTLE 2030 DISTRICT, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SEATTLE 2030 DISTRICT?
THE BULLITT FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $322,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SEATTLE 2030 DISTRICT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing