Skip to content
Plinth
FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Oklahoma · Nonprofit

SAND SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATION I

SAND SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATION I (Oklahoma) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $9,084 to it, the largest being Paul W Sisemore Charitable Foundation ($5,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$339k
Revenue FY2024
4
Funders on record
$9k
Grants received
$2.0M
Net assets
2/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 2%

Against its field

SAND SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATION I runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 22,771 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin44% · top quartile
Months of reserve12.0mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)11% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 22,771 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($160k) Expenses 100 ($111k) Net assets 100 ($1.7M)2018 Revenue 50 ($79k) Expenses 97 ($108k) Net assets 98 ($1.7M)2019 Revenue 107 ($171k) Expenses 98 ($109k) Net assets 102 ($1.7M)2020 Revenue 153 ($245k) Expenses 154 ($172k) Net assets 106 ($1.8M)2021 Revenue 113 ($181k) Expenses 165 ($184k) Net assets 106 ($1.8M)2022 Revenue 121 ($194k) Expenses 135 ($150k) Net assets 111 ($1.9M)2023 Revenue 138 ($221k) Expenses 142 ($158k) Net assets 113 ($1.9M)2024 Revenue 212 ($339k) Expenses 170 ($190k) Net assets 120 ($2.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (212)Expenses (170)Net assets (120)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

29% of SAND SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATION I’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (58% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 24,851 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$48k
17
$28k
18
$62k
19
$73k
20
$3k
21
$43k
22
$63k
23
$149k
24
12
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $181 → $143.

1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)8% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $21k from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Sand Springs Home). These are real filings, and they are not money SAND SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATION I raised.

From the IRS filings of SAND SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATION I’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SAND SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATION I leans on a few funders — its largest provides 55% of grant income and the top three 92%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

55%
largest funder
92%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 84% · 2022 78% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of SAND SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATION I's grant income comes from Oklahoma funders.

OK

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

21
22
Oklahoma out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $684 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like SAND SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATION I

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Oklahoma

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

70% of spending goes to programs.

Program 70%Management 10%Fundraising 21%

Governance

14
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

53%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OK

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SAND SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATION I: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SAND SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATION I?
SAND SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATION I (Oklahoma) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $9,084 to it, the largest being Paul W Sisemore Charitable Foundation ($5,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does SAND SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATION I have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $9,084 in grants to SAND SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATION I, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SAND SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATION I?
Paul W Sisemore Charitable Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $5,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SAND SPRINGS EDUCATION FOUNDATION I find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oklahoma. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing