Nebraska · Nonprofit
Revitalization Association of Weeping Water
Revitalization Association of Weeping Water (Nebraska) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $123,500 to it, the largest being COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR WESTERN IOWA ($100,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 85% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- Revenue FY2024
- $138k
- Funders on record
- 3
- Grants received
- $124k
- Net assets
- $27k
What Revitalization Association of Weeping Water does
Mission
Stimulate economic debelopment in Weeping Water, creating a positive image for the town and to recieve and distribute funds for community growth and activities.
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.
Program
Created a depot park in Weeping Water, NE
$130,370 spentof which $130,370 as grants100% of program spending
The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $130,370.
Who funds it, year by year
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 85% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Revitalization Association of Weeping Water’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
Revitalization Association of Weeping Water leans on a few funders — its largest provides 81% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
85% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Revitalization Association of Weeping Water.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
85% of Revitalization Association of Weeping Water's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $19k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Nebraska funders.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $105k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
Revitalization Association of Weeping Water receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $124k to it.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,971 community improvement nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Organizations like Revitalization Association of Weeping Water
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Nebraska
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
96% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Revitalization Association of Weeping Water: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Revitalization Association of Weeping Water?
- Revitalization Association of Weeping Water (Nebraska) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $123,500 to it, the largest being COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR WESTERN IOWA ($100,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 85% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does Revitalization Association of Weeping Water have?
- IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $123,500 in grants to Revitalization Association of Weeping Water, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of Revitalization Association of Weeping Water?
- COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR WESTERN IOWA is the largest funder on record, with $100,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Revitalization Association of Weeping Water find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Nebraska. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2024–2024), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing