Loading…
Loading…
Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit
Restoring Ivy Collective Inc (Washington, D.C.) is funded by 7 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $113,043 in grants to it, the largest being THE WILD GIFTING PROJECT ($30,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Restoring Ivy Collective Inc runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 20,812 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 20,812 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2023
$35k from 2 funders in 2024, up from $79k and 5 in 2023.
3 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 59% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Restoring Ivy Collective Inc’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
Restoring Ivy Collective Inc has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 27% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2023 38% · 2024 71% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
Restoring Ivy Collective Inc draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C. — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 5 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Operates in 2 states
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2023–2023), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing