Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Utah · Nonprofit

PROVO FOUNDATION

PROVO FOUNDATION (Utah) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $146,873 to it, the largest being WADSWORTH GOLF CHARITIES FOUNDATION ($95,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$239k
Revenue FY2025
7
Funders on record
$147k
Grants received
$3.3M
Net assets
2/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 43%

Against its field

PROVO FOUNDATION holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 3,857 philanthropy nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−20% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve42.1mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)10% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,857 philanthropy nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($125k) Expenses 100 ($234k) Net assets 100 ($3.0M)2019 Revenue 125 ($156k) Expenses 107 ($251k) Net assets 97 ($2.9M)2020 Revenue 111 ($139k) Expenses 8 ($18k) Net assets 101 ($3.0M)2021 Revenue 287 ($357k) Expenses 75 ($175k) Net assets 107 ($3.2M)2022 Revenue 156 ($194k) Expenses 83 ($195k) Net assets 107 ($3.2M)2023 Revenue 197 ($245k) Expenses 57 ($134k) Net assets 111 ($3.3M)2024 Revenue 279 ($347k) Expenses 154 ($362k) Net assets 110 ($3.3M)2025 Revenue 192 ($239k) Expenses 122 ($285k) Net assets 108 ($3.3M)
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (192)Expenses (122)Net assets (108)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

37% of PROVO FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (87% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,816 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$110k
18
$96k
19
$121k
20
$182k
21
$2k
22
$111k
23
$15k
24
$47k
25
42
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income rose $11k → $12k.

2 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)12% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PROVO FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PROVO FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 65% of grant income and the top three 85%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

25% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PROVO FOUNDATION.

65%
largest funder
85%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 91% · 2020 83% · 2021 79% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

PROVO FOUNDATION draws 73% of its grant income from funders outside Utah, across 2 states in all.

IL
UT

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
20
21
22
23
Utah out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $17k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like PROVO FOUNDATION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Utah

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

52%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

UT

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PROVO FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PROVO FOUNDATION?
PROVO FOUNDATION (Utah) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $146,873 to it, the largest being WADSWORTH GOLF CHARITIES FOUNDATION ($95,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does PROVO FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $146,873 in grants to PROVO FOUNDATION, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PROVO FOUNDATION?
WADSWORTH GOLF CHARITIES FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $95,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PROVO FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Utah. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing