Skip to content

Utah · Public charity

Cities Strong Foundation

The organization's mission is to (I) contribute to or engage in projects promoting community improvement, health and civic engagement in cities, towns, and communities located in the state of utah, (ii) implement and provide life-skills, training and educational opportunities to residents of neighborhoods and communities in the state of…

$194k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
4
Itemized grants FY2024
1
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$189k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$111,350
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$273k
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$111kReligion$50kPublic Benefit$20kEducation$20k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Good Samaritan Foundation$111,35019%
Sisdac - West Valley City - Utah$50,00016%
Ogden City - Cares Grants$20,0001n/a
Provo Foundation$19,50025%

Compare Cities Strong Foundation with peer funders

About Cities Strong Foundation

How much does Cities Strong Foundation give?
Cities Strong Foundation reported 4 itemized grants totaling $188,850, out of $193,850 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Cities Strong Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2024, its largest causes are Crime & Legal (55%), Religion (25%), Public Benefit (10%).
Who are Cities Strong Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2024: The Good Samaritan Foundation ($111k), Sisdac - West Valley City - Utah ($50k), Ogden City - Cares Grants ($20k).
Where is Cities Strong Foundation based?
Cities Strong Foundation is based in UT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 4 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cities Strong’s filings →

More from the funding graph