Colorado · Nonprofit
POUDRE HERITAGE ALLIANCE
POUDRE HERITAGE ALLIANCE (Colorado) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $356,537 to it, the largest being National Park Foundation ($275,555). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
POUDRE HERITAGE ALLIANCE's funding base is broadening — from 1 funders to 3 as grant income climbed.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,156 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Realities for Children Charitiesshared funderslocal
- Forever Our Rivers Foundationportfolio match
- Eleanor and Henry Hitchcock Charitable Foundationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2018 92% · 2019 82% · 2020 82% · 2021 80% · 2022 93% · 2023 71% · 2024 73% · 2025 66%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
99% of POUDRE HERITAGE ALLIANCE’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (88% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $24k → $114k.
2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 23% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of POUDRE HERITAGE ALLIANCE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
POUDRE HERITAGE ALLIANCE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 77% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund POUDRE HERITAGE ALLIANCE.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
POUDRE HERITAGE ALLIANCE draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Colorado, across 2 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $80k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Realities for Children Charitiesshared funderslocalCO · backs 22 organizations that share your funders · funds 35 organizations near you
- Forever Our Rivers Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Eleanor and Henry Hitchcock Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Colorado Watershed Assemblyportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Conservation Lands Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Musser Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Bep Earthwise Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Charles H Kurtz Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Lewis and Clark Trail Heritage Fdtnportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Forest Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Rei Cooperative Action Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Charlotte y Martin Foundation-Imaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Government funding POUDRE HERITAGE ALLIANCE receives
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $3.7M on record.
- Department of the Interior$3.7M
- National Endowment for the Humanities$24k
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Organizations like POUDRE HERITAGE ALLIANCE
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Colorado
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
81% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for POUDRE HERITAGE ALLIANCE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds POUDRE HERITAGE ALLIANCE?
- POUDRE HERITAGE ALLIANCE (Colorado) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $356,537 to it, the largest being National Park Foundation ($275,555). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does POUDRE HERITAGE ALLIANCE have?
- IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $356,537 in grants to POUDRE HERITAGE ALLIANCE, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of POUDRE HERITAGE ALLIANCE?
- National Park Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $275,555 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like POUDRE HERITAGE ALLIANCE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing