Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

PMA EDUCATION FUND

PMA EDUCATION FUND (Washington) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $92,683 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($47,795). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 52% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$435k
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$93k
Net assets
$335k
4/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 7%
01What it does

What Pma Education Fund does

Mission

Pma Education Fund works to be the trusted resourse and thought-leader for funeral choice, education and advocacy in washington state. We envision a future where everyone has access to after-death arrangements that reflect their personal values and resources.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Educating members about options and encouraging them to complete advanceplanning documents to pre-authorize their burial or cremation arrangements.Pma Education Fund makes this information and these forms available tomembers through new member packets, educational events and on our website.simplifying the process of pre-authorizing funeral arrangements not onlyassures members that their cremation or burial wishes will be honored butalso helps families make informed choices that are consistent with theirvalues as well within their family budget.

    $115,507 spent$59,174 earned by the program
    42% of program spending
  2. Making simple, dignified, affordable cremation and burial servicesavailable to consumers. This is accomplished through negotiating contractswith 22 funeral homes across the state of washington, which provides lowcost cremation and burial services to members of the association.

    $103,354 spent$55,924 earned by the program
    38% of program spending
  3. Educating all consumers regarding their rights, options andresponsibilities in making death care choices. This is accomplished throughproviding consumer information on our website, through public speakingengagements and by answering phone calls and emails for thousands ofconsumers every year.

    $55,165 spent$28,262 earned by the program
    20% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $274,026.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($257k) Expenses 100 ($177k) Net assets 100 ($196k)2018 Revenue 81 ($208k) Expenses 108 ($191k) Net assets 109 ($213k)2019 Revenue 90 ($233k) Expenses 110 ($195k) Net assets 128 ($250k)2020 Revenue 91 ($235k) Expenses 123 ($218k) Net assets 137 ($268k)2021 Revenue 113 ($290k) Expenses 149 ($264k) Net assets 151 ($296k)2022 Revenue 106 ($273k) Expenses 144 ($255k) Net assets 160 ($314k)2023 Revenue 117 ($300k) Expenses 159 ($281k) Net assets 151 ($295k)2024 Revenue 104 ($268k) Expenses 184 ($326k) Net assets 121 ($237k)2025 Revenue 169 ($435k) Expenses 190 ($337k) Net assets 171 ($335k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (169)Expenses (190)Net assets (171)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $242k to $337k (+39%).

$202k
$216k
$257k
$302k
$304k
$314k
$297k
$242k
$337k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

67% of PMA EDUCATION FUND’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (57% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 25,057 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$80k
’17
$17k
’18
$38k
’19
$18k
’20
$26k
’21
$18k
’22
$19k
’23
−$58k
’24
$98k
’25
3.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed1213131313111097
Joined·+1+5+8+3+2+5+3+3
No longer listed·05834645
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $2k → $20k.

2 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 52% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PMA EDUCATION FUND’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PMA EDUCATION FUND leans on a few funders — its largest provides 52% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

98% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PMA EDUCATION FUND.

52%
largest funder
97%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 67% · 2020 91% · 2021 100% · 2022 98% · 2023 63% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

52% of PMA EDUCATION FUND's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $45k that is directly attributable, 84% of it comes from funders outside Washington, across 3 states.

WA
CA
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’19
’20
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $48k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

PMA EDUCATION FUND runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 17,450 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin22% · top quartile
Months of reserve3.7mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)7% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 17,450 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like PMA EDUCATION FUND

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 19%Fundraising 0%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PMA EDUCATION FUND: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PMA EDUCATION FUND?
PMA EDUCATION FUND (Washington) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $92,683 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($47,795). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 52% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does PMA EDUCATION FUND have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $92,683 in grants to PMA EDUCATION FUND, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PMA EDUCATION FUND?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $47,795 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PMA EDUCATION FUND find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing