California · Nonprofit
Perfect Play Athletics Foundation
Perfect Play Athletics Foundation (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,300 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($2,300). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- California Restaurant Foundation Inclocal
- Pitch in for Baseball and Softballportfolio match
- The Rose Hills Foundationlocal
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
Who funds it, year by year
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Perfect Play Athletics Foundation’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 1 of 2 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of Perfect Play Athletics Foundation's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $2k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- California Restaurant Foundation InclocalCA · funds 169 organizations near you
- Pitch in for Baseball and Softballportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Rose Hills FoundationlocalCA · funds 476 organizations near you
- Fantasy Camps for Kidsportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Shelter Partnership InclocalCA · funds 335 organizations near you
- MLB-MLBPA Youth Development Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United Way InclocalCA · funds 421 organizations near you
- QueensCarelocalCA · funds 184 organizations near you
- The Players Alliance Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Prime Coalition Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Harold and Carole Pump Foundation (Fka the Harold Pump Foundation)portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Clearwater for Youth Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like Perfect Play Athletics Foundation
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Perfect Play Athletics Foundation: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Perfect Play Athletics Foundation?
- Perfect Play Athletics Foundation (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,300 to it, the largest being NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ($2,300). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does Perfect Play Athletics Foundation have?
- IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $2,300 in grants to Perfect Play Athletics Foundation.
- Who is the largest funder of Perfect Play Athletics Foundation?
- NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC is the largest funder on record, with $2,300 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Perfect Play Athletics Foundation find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2019 (financials across 2017–2019), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing