Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

PARTNERSHIPS TO UPLIFT COMMUNITIES VALLEY

PARTNERSHIPS TO UPLIFT COMMUNITIES VALLEY (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,502 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($1,502). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$43M
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$2k
Net assets
$15M
1/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What Partnerships to Uplift Communities Valley does

Mission

To develop & manage high quality charter schools in densely populated urban communities with overcrowded & low achieving schools.vision: to facilitate school reform within lausd through a regional approach currently focused on the communities of ne san fernando vly.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Advance the education and training of young men and women by managing, operating, guiding, directing, and promoting public charter schools in the los angeles area.

    $32,413,772 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $32,413,772.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($29M) Expenses 100 ($28M) Net assets 100 ($5.7M)2018 Revenue 108 ($31M) Expenses 106 ($29M) Net assets 140 ($7.9M)2019 Revenue 109 ($32M) Expenses 108 ($30M) Net assets 175 ($9.9M)2020 Revenue 106 ($31M) Expenses 108 ($30M) Net assets 195 ($11M)2021 Revenue 136 ($39M) Expenses 112 ($31M) Net assets 344 ($20M)2022 Revenue 137 ($40M) Expenses 127 ($35M) Net assets 429 ($24M)2023 Revenue 162 ($47M) Expenses 170 ($47M) Net assets 434 ($25M)2024 Revenue 139 ($40M) Expenses 165 ($46M) Net assets 343 ($19M)2025 Revenue 148 ($43M) Expenses 172 ($47M) Net assets 264 ($15M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (148)Expenses (172)Net assets (264)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $37M to $46M (+24%).

$34M
$35M
$36M
$37M
$46M
$50M
$57M
$51M
$47M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 97% · 2018 96% · 2019 97% · 2020 98% · 2021 99% · 2022 98% · 2023 98% · 2024 98% · 2025 97%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.5M
’17
$2.3M
’18
$2.0M
’19
$1.1M
’20
$8.5M
’21
$4.8M
’22
$268k
’23
−$5.1M
’24
−$4.5M
’25
4.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Concepcion Rivas

CEO

Board chair

Juana Maria Valdivia

Board president

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed12139121211101215
Joined·+4+5+5+3+1+3+6+5
No longer listed·39232442
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $283 → $331.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
total
funders
1
1
2
1

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PARTNERSHIPS TO UPLIFT COMMUNITIES VALLEY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 1 of 2 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of PARTNERSHIPS TO UPLIFT COMMUNITIES VALLEY's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $2k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like PARTNERSHIPS TO UPLIFT COMMUNITIES VALLEY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

68% of spending goes to programs.

Program 68%Management 31%Fundraising 1%

Governance

5
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Part of a family of 3 related entities

  • Tri-Lake Charter Properties LLC · disregarded
  • Partnership to Uplift Communities - Lvt · exempt
  • Partnership to Uplift Communities - La · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PARTNERSHIPS TO UPLIFT COMMUNITIES VALLEY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PARTNERSHIPS TO UPLIFT COMMUNITIES VALLEY?
PARTNERSHIPS TO UPLIFT COMMUNITIES VALLEY (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,502 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($1,502). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does PARTNERSHIPS TO UPLIFT COMMUNITIES VALLEY have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $1,502 in grants to PARTNERSHIPS TO UPLIFT COMMUNITIES VALLEY, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PARTNERSHIPS TO UPLIFT COMMUNITIES VALLEY?
AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,502 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PARTNERSHIPS TO UPLIFT COMMUNITIES VALLEY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Partnerships to Uplift Communities Valley →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing