Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Olivann

Olivann (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $28,222,158 to it, the largest being DECHOMAI ASSET TRUST ($21,931,164). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$24k
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$28M
Net assets
$17M
1/3 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Olivann does

Mission

Provide counseling services to low-income individuals and public servants suffering from trauma;Improve the environment, including creating environmental and educationprograms around restoration ecology, public access to nature, and educationaround sustainable and equitable provision of food, shelter, energy, and materials;Conduct research to promote advancement in the sciences and humanities and develop technologies and processes to facilitate others to do the same; and Make grants to promote the above.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Olivann carries out its mission to provide free psychological support services through its Mishnock Center Program in Oakland California. The two target populations for Mishnock are returning veterans and sexual assault survivors with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. While some psychological needs of veterans are covered by the VA, the VA in northern California does not cover eye movement desensitization and reprocessing, many of those in need are also low income individuals. Alameda county has a population of 15 million with more than 70 thousand veterans and 4% of the population at or below the poverty level so there is a critical need for Mishnock's services.

    $327,302 spent
    52% of program spending
  2. Improve the environment, including creating environmental and education programs around restoration ecology, public access to nature, and education around sustainable and equitable provision of food, shelter, energy, and materials; Conduct research to promote advancement in the sciences and humanities and develop technologies and processes to facilitate others to do the same.

    $303,074 spent
    48% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $630,376.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($701k) Expenses 100 ($362k) Net assets 100 ($665k)2018 Revenue 0 ($844) Expenses 161 ($584k) Net assets 12 ($82k)2019 Revenue 100 ($701k) Expenses 161 ($581k) Net assets 30 ($202k)2020 Revenue 240 ($1.7M) Expenses 177 ($640k) Net assets 188 ($1.2M)2021 Revenue 87 ($611k) Expenses 184 ($667k) Net assets 179 ($1.2M)2022 Revenue 171 ($1.2M) Expenses 177 ($641k) Net assets 263 ($1.7M)2023 Revenue 2044 ($14M) Expenses 191 ($690k) Net assets 2334 ($16M)2024 Revenue -1 ($-8772) Expenses 228 ($827k) Net assets 2445 ($16M)2025 Revenue 3 ($24k) Expenses 271 ($983k) Net assets 2483 ($17M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (3)Expenses (271)Net assets (2483)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $1.7M to $16M (+787%).

$665k
$82k
$202k
$1.2M
$1.2M
$1.7M
$16M
$16M
$17M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

307% of Olivann’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,248 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$339k
’17
−$583k
’18
$120k
’19
$1.0M
’20
−$56k
’21
$561k
’22
$14M
’23
−$836k
’24
−$958k
’25
11
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed444444444
Joined·+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0
No longer listed·00000000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $478k → $23M.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
total
funders
1
1
1
1
2
1
2

3 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Olivann’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Olivann leans on a few funders — its largest provides 78% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Olivann.

78%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 99% · 2022 100% · 2023 96% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of Olivann's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $28M arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Olivann's revenue fell 97% between 2017 and 2025.

Operating margin−3927% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve10.6mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−34% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,752 health nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Organizations like Olivann

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

64% of spending goes to programs.

Program 64%Management 36%Fundraising 0%

Governance

4
board members
50%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Olivann: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Olivann?
Olivann (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $28,222,158 to it, the largest being DECHOMAI ASSET TRUST ($21,931,164). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Olivann have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $28,222,158 in grants to Olivann, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Olivann?
DECHOMAI ASSET TRUST is the largest funder on record, with $21,931,164 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Olivann find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing