Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INALLIANCE

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INALLIANCE (California) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $44,164 to it, the largest being Sacramento Region Community Foundation ($26,720). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 73% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$22M
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$44k
Net assets
$18M
4/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What Northern California Inalliance does

Mission

InAlliance is a nonprofit organization providing services to adults with developmental disabilities in the greater Sacramento area. Programs focus on job placement, on-site training and the development of supports necessary for employment and community living.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Supportive living services for the developmentally disabled (approximately 44 people served).

    $7,857,795 spent$9,052,183 earned by the program
    50% of program spending
  2. Developmentally disabled program designed to assist with living & coping skills and job training (approximately 165 people served).

    $6,217,896 spent$6,246,563 earned by the program
    39% of program spending
  3. Work & life skills for the developmentally disabled (approximately 23 people served).

    $1,053,990 spent$1,266,901 earned by the program
    7% of program spending
  4. Supported employment for the developmentally disabled (approximately 77 people served).

    $348,532 spent$488,668 earned by the program
    2% of program spending
  5. Teaching independent living skills (approximately 49 people served).

    $285,291 spent$160,301 earned by the program
    2% of program spending

The 5 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $15,763,504.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($19M) Expenses 100 ($18M) Net assets 100 ($9.0M)2018 Revenue 110 ($20M) Expenses 112 ($20M) Net assets 106 ($9.5M)2019 Revenue 107 ($20M) Expenses 113 ($20M) Net assets 106 ($9.6M)2020 Revenue 110 ($21M) Expenses 114 ($20M) Net assets 110 ($9.9M)2021 Revenue 110 ($21M) Expenses 101 ($18M) Net assets 147 ($13M)2022 Revenue 96 ($18M) Expenses 92 ($16M) Net assets 160 ($14M)2023 Revenue 85 ($16M) Expenses 93 ($17M) Net assets 157 ($14M)2024 Revenue 86 ($16M) Expenses 96 ($17M) Net assets 153 ($14M)2025 Revenue 118 ($22M) Expenses 100 ($18M) Net assets 205 ($18M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (118)Expenses (100)Net assets (205)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $15M to $21M (+38%).

$10M
$12M
$12M
$12M
$15M
$16M
$16M
$15M
$21M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 0% · 2021 2% · 2024 0% · 2025 20%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$819k
’17
$388k
’18
−$146k
’19
$295k
’20
$2.6M
’21
$1.6M
’22
−$805k
’23
−$1.1M
’24
$4.2M
’25
1.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Andrea Croom

Exec. Director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed111214109991010
Joined·+2+4+0+0+0+0+1+1
No longer listed·12410001
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $8k → $12k.

3 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 73% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INALLIANCE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INALLIANCE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 61% of grant income and the top three 88%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

73% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INALLIANCE.

61%
largest funder
88%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 94% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 82% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

73% of NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INALLIANCE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $12k that is directly attributable, 83% of it comes from California funders.

CA
MO

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’18
’19
’20
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $32k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INALLIANCE

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

89% of spending goes to programs.

Program 89%Management 11%Fundraising 0%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INALLIANCE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INALLIANCE?
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INALLIANCE (California) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $44,164 to it, the largest being Sacramento Region Community Foundation ($26,720). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 73% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INALLIANCE have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $44,164 in grants to NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INALLIANCE, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INALLIANCE?
Sacramento Region Community Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $26,720 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INALLIANCE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Northern California Inalliance →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing