Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

California · Nonprofit

NEW LEAF COLLABORATIVE

NEW LEAF COLLABORATIVE (California) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $269 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($269). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$408k
Revenue FY2025
1
Funders on record
$269
Grants received
$136k
Net assets
1/1 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%

Against its field

NEW LEAF COLLABORATIVE runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 15,926 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin21% · above the median
Months of reserve4.6mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)9% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 15,926 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($198k) Expenses 100 ($214k) Net assets 100 ($34k)2018 Revenue 155 ($306k) Expenses 123 ($265k) Net assets 224 ($75k)2019 Revenue 145 ($286k) Expenses 120 ($256k) Net assets 312 ($105k)2020 Revenue 87 ($172k) Expenses 69 ($147k) Net assets 274 ($92k)2021 Revenue 35 ($68k) Expenses 41 ($88k) Net assets 216 ($73k)2022 Revenue 62 ($122k) Expenses 62 ($132k) Net assets 186 ($63k)2023 Revenue 75 ($149k) Expenses 76 ($163k) Net assets 143 ($48k)2024 Revenue 148 ($292k) Expenses 136 ($291k) Net assets 147 ($50k)2025 Revenue 207 ($408k) Expenses 150 ($322k) Net assets 403 ($136k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (207)Expenses (150)Net assets (403)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 6% · 2018 1% · 2019 1% · 2020 3% · 2021 28% · 2022 25% · 2023 3% · 2024 19% · 2025 23%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

44% of NEW LEAF COLLABORATIVE’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (58% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 24,851 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$17k
17
$42k
18
$30k
19
$25k
20
$20k
21
$10k
22
$14k
23
$1k
24
$86k
25
4.6
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $92 → $39.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
total
funders
1
1
1
1

1 of 1 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of NEW LEAF COLLABORATIVE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of NEW LEAF COLLABORATIVE's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $269 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like NEW LEAF COLLABORATIVE

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

79% of spending goes to programs.

Program 79%Management 21%Fundraising 0%

Governance

8
board members
88%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

84%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for NEW LEAF COLLABORATIVE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds NEW LEAF COLLABORATIVE?
NEW LEAF COLLABORATIVE (California) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $269 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($269). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does NEW LEAF COLLABORATIVE have?
IRS filings report 1 organization giving $269 in grants to NEW LEAF COLLABORATIVE, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of NEW LEAF COLLABORATIVE?
AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $269 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like NEW LEAF COLLABORATIVE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 1funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing