Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

National Workforce Registry Alliance Inc

National Workforce Registry Alliance Inc (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $600,000 to it, the largest being WK Kellogg Foundation ($480,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$197k
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$600k
Net assets
$210k
2/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 55%
01What it does

What National Workforce Registry Alliance Inc does

Mission

The national workforce registry alliance advances an equitably recognized and represented early childhood and out-of-school time workforce, by strengthening data quality and establishing professional development system standards for registries.

As stated on its FY2023 Form 990.

Program

  1. Effective at the close of business on December 31, 2024, NWRA completed a board-approved transfer of specified assets and program operations to the Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska, acting on behalf of the Buffett Early Childhood Institute. The transaction was an asset transfer and did not constitute a merger or transfer of governance over NWRA as a separate Wisconsin nonprofit corporation. Implementation of the operational transition continued during the first several months of 2025. NWRA subsequently resumed independent organizational activity while the parties negotiated the return of specified assets. After fiscal year-end, the parties executed an agreement providing for the return of specified assets effective February 27, 2026. NWRA filed articles of dissolution in Wisconsin effective May 31, 2025, but revoked the dissolution on June 26, 2025. The revocation was retroactive under Wisconsin law, and NWRAs corporate existence remained continuous.

    $145,268 spent$137,851 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $145,268.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($163k) Expenses 100 ($101k) Net assets 100 ($206k)2018 Revenue 102 ($167k) Expenses 191 ($194k) Net assets 87 ($179k)2019 Revenue 77 ($125k) Expenses 146 ($148k) Net assets 76 ($156k)2020 Revenue 107 ($174k) Expenses 127 ($128k) Net assets 98 ($202k)2021 Revenue 158 ($258k) Expenses 166 ($168k) Net assets 142 ($292k)2022 Revenue 134 ($219k) Expenses 218 ($221k) Net assets 120 ($246k)2023 Revenue 306 ($500k) Expenses 454 ($460k) Net assets 139 ($286k)2024 Revenue 380 ($621k) Expenses 642 ($650k) Net assets 125 ($257k)2025 Revenue 120 ($197k) Expenses 240 ($243k) Net assets 102 ($210k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (120)Expenses (240)Net assets (102)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $209k to $294k (+41%).

$206k
$179k
$157k
$209k
$294k
$271k
$290k
$344k
$266k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

30% of National Workforce Registry Alliance Inc’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (91% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 23,870 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$62k
’17
−$27k
’18
−$23k
’19
$46k
’20
$90k
’21
−$2k
’22
$40k
’23
−$29k
’24
−$46k
’25
0.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Kimberlee Belcher-Badal

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

20212022202320242025
Listed1917121616
Joined·+9+8+7+4
No longer listed·111334
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $25k → $145k.

1 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of National Workforce Registry Alliance Inc’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

National Workforce Registry Alliance Inc leans on a few funders — its largest provides 80% of grant income and the top three 96%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

80%
largest funder
96%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 83% · 2022 100% · 2023 86% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

National Workforce Registry Alliance Inc draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 3 states in all.

MI
NY
NE

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $25k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

National Workforce Registry Alliance Inc's funding base is broadening — from 1 funders to 2 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−24% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.4mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)2% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,062 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Government funding National Workforce Registry Alliance Inc receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $4k on record.

State$4k
18
19
20
21
23
24
25
Top programs
  • (EE) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES$4k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like National Workforce Registry Alliance Inc

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

60% of spending goes to programs.

Program 60%Management 40%Fundraising 0%

Governance

15
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

72%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for National Workforce Registry Alliance Inc: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds National Workforce Registry Alliance Inc?
National Workforce Registry Alliance Inc (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $600,000 to it, the largest being WK Kellogg Foundation ($480,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does National Workforce Registry Alliance Inc have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $600,000 in grants to National Workforce Registry Alliance Inc, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of National Workforce Registry Alliance Inc?
WK Kellogg Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $480,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like National Workforce Registry Alliance Inc find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds National Workforce Registry Alliance →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing