Skip to content

Wisconsin · Nonprofit

NATIONAL SOCIETY OF COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA-STATE OF WISCONSIN

NATIONAL SOCIETY OF COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA-STATE OF WISCONSIN (Wisconsin) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $66,070 to it, the largest being GREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INC ($45,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 69% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$37k
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$66k
Net assets
$0
3/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 19%
01What it does

What National Society of Colonial Dames of America-State of Wisconsin does

Mission

To collect and preserve manuscripts, traditions, relics and memontos of bygone days; to preserve and restore buildings connectd with the early history of our contry, to diffuse healthful and intelligent information concerning the past, to create a popular interest in our colonial history, to stimulate a spirit of true patriotism and a genuine love of country, and to impress upon the youn the sacred obligations of honoring the memory of those heroic ancestors whose ability, valor, sufferings, and achievements are beyond all praise.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Purpose is to collect and preserve manuscripts, relics, traditions, and momentos of bygone days and to create an interest in our colonial history

    $118,022 spentof which $2,202 as grants$9,889 earned by the program
    100% of program spending
  2. Provide scholarships to history graduate students

The 2 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $118,022.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($104k) Expenses 100 ($112k) Net assets 100 ($1.3M)2018 Revenue 95 ($98k) Expenses 109 ($123k) Net assets 109 ($1.4M)2019 Revenue 131 ($136k) Expenses 130 ($146k) Net assets 111 ($1.4M)2020 Revenue 114 ($118k) Expenses 119 ($134k) Net assets 108 ($1.4M)2021 Revenue 186 ($193k) Expenses 105 ($118k) Net assets 137 ($1.7M)2022 Revenue 126 ($131k) Expenses 111 ($124k) Net assets 130 ($1.6M)2023 Revenue 800 ($829k) Expenses 114 ($128k) Net assets 160 ($2.0M)2024 Revenue 240 ($249k) Expenses 122 ($137k) Net assets 187 ($2.4M)2025 Revenue 35 ($37k) Expenses 141 ($158k) Net assets 0 ($0)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (35)Expenses (141)Net assets (0)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $2.5M to $0 (−100%).

$1.3M
$1.4M
$1.4M
$1.4M
$1.8M
$1.7M
$2.1M
$2.5M
$0
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 6% · 2022 10% · 2024 5%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$9k
’17
−$25k
’18
−$10k
’19
−$16k
’20
$75k
’21
$7k
’22
$701k
’23
$111k
’24
−$122k
’25
19
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Adam Novey

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2019 and FY2020 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed121615121210101111
Joined·+5+3+3+0+0+0+1+0
No longer listed·14602000
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 3 funders, grant income fell $22k → $21k.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
total
funders
3
1
3
3

2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 69% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of NATIONAL SOCIETY OF COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA-STATE OF WISCONSIN’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

NATIONAL SOCIETY OF COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA-STATE OF WISCONSIN leans on a few funders — its largest provides 68% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund NATIONAL SOCIETY OF COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA-STATE OF WISCONSIN.

68%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 66% · 2021 100% · 2022 64% · 2023 75% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

69% of NATIONAL SOCIETY OF COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA-STATE OF WISCONSIN's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $21k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Wisconsin funders.

WI

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’22
’23
Wisconsin out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $45k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like NATIONAL SOCIETY OF COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA-STATE OF WISCONSIN

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Wisconsin

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

74% of spending goes to programs.

Program 74%Management 25%Fundraising 1%

Governance

10
board members
60%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

77%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WI

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Historic Indian Agency House Association Inc · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for NATIONAL SOCIETY OF COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA-STATE OF WISCONSIN: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds NATIONAL SOCIETY OF COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA-STATE OF WISCONSIN?
NATIONAL SOCIETY OF COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA-STATE OF WISCONSIN (Wisconsin) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $66,070 to it, the largest being GREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INC ($45,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 69% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does NATIONAL SOCIETY OF COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA-STATE OF WISCONSIN have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $66,070 in grants to NATIONAL SOCIETY OF COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA-STATE OF WISCONSIN, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of NATIONAL SOCIETY OF COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA-STATE OF WISCONSIN?
GREATER MILWAUKEE FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $45,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like NATIONAL SOCIETY OF COLONIAL DAMES OF AMERICA-STATE OF WISCONSIN find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Wisconsin. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing