Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Ohio · Nonprofit

MISSION OF LOVE

MISSION OF LOVE (Ohio) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,126,775 to it, the largest being THE MPB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ($1,080,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$208k
Revenue FY2024
5
Funders on record
$1.1M
Grants received
$48k
Net assets
3/5 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year

Against its field

MISSION OF LOVE's funding has concentrated — grant income rose while the number of funders held roughly flat.

Operating margin−4% · below the median
Months of reserve2.7mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−2% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 7,105 philanthropy nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($239k) Expenses 100 ($167k) Net assets 100 ($77k)2018 Revenue 74 ($178k) Expenses 106 ($177k) Net assets 95 ($73k)2019 Revenue 79 ($189k) Expenses 104 ($173k) Net assets 116 ($89k)2020 Revenue 78 ($188k) Expenses 83 ($139k) Net assets 179 ($138k)2021 Revenue 85 ($203k) Expenses 148 ($248k) Net assets 121 ($93k)2022 Revenue 78 ($187k) Expenses 117 ($196k) Net assets 109 ($84k)2023 Revenue 99 ($238k) Expenses 160 ($267k) Net assets 72 ($55k)2024 Revenue 87 ($208k) Expenses 129 ($216k) Net assets 62 ($48k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (87)Expenses (129)Net assets (62)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of MISSION OF LOVE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (87% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,816 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$72k
17
$859
18
$16k
19
$49k
20
$45k
21
$9k
22
$29k
23
$7k
24
2.7
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income rose $143k → $240k.

3 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)2% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of MISSION OF LOVE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

MISSION OF LOVE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 96% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

96%
largest funder
99%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 84% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 95% · 2022 94% · 2023 100%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of MISSION OF LOVE's grant income comes from Ohio funders.

OH

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Ohio out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $24k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like MISSION OF LOVE

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ohio

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

100% of spending goes to programs.

Program 100%Management 0%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OH

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MISSION OF LOVE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MISSION OF LOVE?
MISSION OF LOVE (Ohio) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,126,775 to it, the largest being THE MPB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ($1,080,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does MISSION OF LOVE have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $1,126,775 in grants to MISSION OF LOVE, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MISSION OF LOVE?
THE MPB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $1,080,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MISSION OF LOVE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ohio. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing