Skip to content

Oklahoma · Nonprofit

Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Chahta

Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Chahta (Oklahoma) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $35,500 to it, the largest being COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION ($25,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 70% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$248k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$36k
Net assets
$202k
1/2 repeat funders
01What it does

What Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Chahta does

Mission

Missing Murdered Indigenous Women - Chahta exists to raise awareness of Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Men support victims and families through advocacy and emergency assistance promote prevention through education and healthy relationship awareness and strengthen Indigenous communities through outreach training and collaborative support efforts.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. MMIW Chahta conducted advocacy and awareness efforts focused on Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Men. Activities included community outreach awareness campaigns education sharing and participation in events intended to increase publish understanding of violence impacting Indigenous communities.

    $27,005 spent
    50% of program spending
  2. MMIW-Chahta assisted individuals and families facing emergency situations through short-term crisis support efforts. Assistance may have included temporary lodging support emergency needs assistance transportation support or coordination with community resources and service providers.

    $12,855 spent
    24% of program spending
  3. MMIW-Chahta participated in and organized community events intended to honor victims support families and raise awareness surrounding the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Men MMIW crisis. The organization also hosted its annual womens conference which focused on empowering women through education community connection advocacy healthy relationship awareness and culturally centered support initiatives. Events and outreach activities were designed to educate the public strengthen community engagement and encourage advocacy efforts within Indigenous communities.

    $7,521 spent
    14% of program spending
  4. MMIW-Chahta promoted prevention and community education through the sharing of information related to domestic violence awareness healthy relationships personal safety and available community resources. Educational outreach was intended to support safer and healthier communities.

    $6,814 spent
    13% of program spending
  5. MMIW Chahta provided support and assistance to Indigenous individuals and families experiencing crisis situations. Services included emotional support advocacy referrals to resources within the community and assistance navigating emergency and community-based services.

    $0 spent
    0% of program spending

The 5 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $54,195.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2024, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2024, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20242024 Revenue 100 ($168k) Expenses 100 ($115k) Net assets 100 ($81k)2025 Revenue 148 ($248k) Expenses 112 ($128k) Net assets 248 ($202k)
20242025
Revenue (148)Expenses (112)Net assets (248)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $81k to $202k (+148%).

$81k
$202k
20242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2025 16%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Chahta’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (91% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 23,870 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 2 reported years ran a deficit.

$53k
’24
$120k
’25
19
months of
reserve
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 70% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Chahta’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Chahta leans on a few funders — its largest provides 70% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

70% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Chahta.

70%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

70% of Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Chahta's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $11k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Oklahoma, across 1 state.

PA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $25k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Chahta runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 13,062 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin48% · top quartile
Months of reserve18.9mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)48% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,062 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Chahta

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Oklahoma

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

42% of spending goes to programs.

Program 42%Management 57%Fundraising 1%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OK

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Chahta: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Chahta?
Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Chahta (Oklahoma) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $35,500 to it, the largest being COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION ($25,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 70% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Chahta have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $35,500 in grants to Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Chahta, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Chahta?
COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $25,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Chahta find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oklahoma. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Missing Murdered Indigenous Women Chahta →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2024–2025), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing