California · Nonprofit
MILITARY SPOUSE ASSOCIATION OF CAMP PENDLETON
MILITARY SPOUSE ASSOCIATION OF CAMP PENDLETON (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $100,096 to it, the largest being AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OUR ARMED FORCES WALT VANBENTHYSEN ($85,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
MILITARY SPOUSE ASSOCIATION OF CAMP PENDLETON runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 16,609 education nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 16,609 education nonprofits under $100k, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Rolf Benirschke Legacy Foundationshared funders
- The Independence Fund Incportfolio match
- The Charlie Daniels Journey Home Projectportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
100% of MILITARY SPOUSE ASSOCIATION OF CAMP PENDLETON’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (65% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $10k → $25k.
1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of MILITARY SPOUSE ASSOCIATION OF CAMP PENDLETON’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
MILITARY SPOUSE ASSOCIATION OF CAMP PENDLETON leans on a few funders — its largest provides 85% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
85% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MILITARY SPOUSE ASSOCIATION OF CAMP PENDLETON.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 75% · 2022 80% · 2023 80% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
MILITARY SPOUSE ASSOCIATION OF CAMP PENDLETON draws 85% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 2 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $96 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Rolf Benirschke Legacy Foundationshared fundersCA · backs 3 organizations that share your funders
- The Independence Fund Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Charlie Daniels Journey Home Projectportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Veterans of Foreign Wars Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Cooking Autism Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- American Legion Post 283portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Phil and Lisa Williams Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- William M Cage Library Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Patriot Fund Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Changex United States Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Patriot Military Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Esther Gordy Bullock Edwards Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like MILITARY SPOUSE ASSOCIATION OF CAMP PENDLETON
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MILITARY SPOUSE ASSOCIATION OF CAMP PENDLETON: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds MILITARY SPOUSE ASSOCIATION OF CAMP PENDLETON?
- MILITARY SPOUSE ASSOCIATION OF CAMP PENDLETON (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $100,096 to it, the largest being AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OUR ARMED FORCES WALT VANBENTHYSEN ($85,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does MILITARY SPOUSE ASSOCIATION OF CAMP PENDLETON have?
- IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $100,096 in grants to MILITARY SPOUSE ASSOCIATION OF CAMP PENDLETON, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of MILITARY SPOUSE ASSOCIATION OF CAMP PENDLETON?
- AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OUR ARMED FORCES WALT VANBENTHYSEN is the largest funder on record, with $85,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like MILITARY SPOUSE ASSOCIATION OF CAMP PENDLETON find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing