Loading…
Loading…
Maryland · Nonprofit
METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON CHAPTER (Maryland) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $72,042 in grants to it, the largest being ASSOCIATED BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS INC ($52,042). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON CHAPTER is funded by 2 grantmakers reporting $72k in grants to it.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,287 employment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
15% of METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON CHAPTER’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (15% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
From the IRS filings of METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON CHAPTER’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON CHAPTER leans on a few funders — its largest provides 72% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON CHAPTER draws 72% of its grant income from funders outside Maryland — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 2 states in all.
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Part of a family of 3 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing