Loading…
Loading…
Ohio · Nonprofit
MERCY OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC (Ohio) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $34,803 in grants to it, the largest being LUTHER HOME OF MERCY FOUNDATION INC ($22,038). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
MERCY OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC has grown faster than half of the 9,383 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,383 health nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Government-grant reliance: 2024 38%. Grants only — government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
38% of MERCY OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (70% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 8 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$13k from 1 funders in 2020, up from $17k and 1 in 2017.
From the IRS filings of MERCY OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
MERCY OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 63% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
MERCY OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Ohio funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
87% of spending goes to programs.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Part of a family of 20 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing