Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Michigan · Nonprofit

MEADOWLARK RETIREMENT VILLAGE

MEADOWLARK RETIREMENT VILLAGE (Michigan) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $357,040 to it, the largest being PORTER HILLS FOUNDATION ($218,762). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$2.9M
Revenue FY2025
2
Funders on record
$357k
Grants received
$422k
Net assets
2/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 5%

Against its field

MEADOWLARK RETIREMENT VILLAGE's funding has concentrated — grant income rose while the number of funders held roughly flat.

Operating margin−21% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.0mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 5,983 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.1M) Expenses 100 ($2.4M) Net assets -71 ($-1882152)2018 Revenue 109 ($2.3M) Expenses 93 ($2.3M) Net assets -66 ($-1770227)2019 Revenue 116 ($2.4M) Expenses 103 ($2.5M) Net assets -71 ($-1893159)2020 Revenue 128 ($2.7M) Expenses 105 ($2.6M) Net assets -69 ($-1828328)2021 Revenue 132 ($2.8M) Expenses 122 ($3.0M) Net assets 100 ($2.7M)2022 Revenue 123 ($2.6M) Expenses 133 ($3.2M) Net assets 75 ($2.0M)2023 Revenue 138 ($2.9M) Expenses 139 ($3.4M) Net assets 56 ($1.5M)2024 Revenue 145 ($3.0M) Expenses 143 ($3.5M) Net assets 39 ($1.0M)2025 Revenue 138 ($2.9M) Expenses 144 ($3.5M) Net assets 16 ($422k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (138)Expenses (144)Net assets (16)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 0% · 2018 0% · 2021 12% · 2022 2% · 2023 1% · 2024 0% · 2025 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

1% of MEADOWLARK RETIREMENT VILLAGE’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,740 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 7 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$345k
17
$27k
18
$66k
19
$112k
20
$218k
21
$671k
22
$493k
23
$465k
24
$612k
25
0.0
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $17k → $17k.

Funder
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'25*
total
funders
1
1
1
1
1
1

From the IRS filings of MEADOWLARK RETIREMENT VILLAGE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.

How concentrated its funding is

MEADOWLARK RETIREMENT VILLAGE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 61% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

61%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.

Where its funders are

100% of MEADOWLARK RETIREMENT VILLAGE's grant income comes from Michigan funders.

MI

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

19
20
21
22
23
Michigan out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like MEADOWLARK RETIREMENT VILLAGE

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

78% of spending goes to programs.

Program 78%Management 22%Fundraising 0%

Governance

13
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

62%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

MI

Part of a family of 17 related entities

  • United Methodist Retirement Communities Inc · exempt
  • Porter Hills Home Health West · exempt
  • Porter Hills at Home · exempt
  • Life Circles · exempt
  • Baileys Grove Retirement Community · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MEADOWLARK RETIREMENT VILLAGE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MEADOWLARK RETIREMENT VILLAGE?
MEADOWLARK RETIREMENT VILLAGE (Michigan) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $357,040 to it, the largest being PORTER HILLS FOUNDATION ($218,762). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does MEADOWLARK RETIREMENT VILLAGE have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $357,040 in grants to MEADOWLARK RETIREMENT VILLAGE, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MEADOWLARK RETIREMENT VILLAGE?
PORTER HILLS FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $218,762 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MEADOWLARK RETIREMENT VILLAGE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. What this page cannot tell you · view filing