Michigan · Nonprofit
MARY AND CHARLES A PARKHILL FOUNDA FOR SPINAL CORD REHABILITATION
MARY AND CHARLES A PARKHILL FOUNDA FOR SPINAL CORD REHABILITATION (Michigan) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $18,613 to it, the largest being Network for Good ($18,093). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 97% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Against its field
MARY AND CHARLES A PARKHILL FOUNDA FOR SPINAL CORD REHABILITATION runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 5,769 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 5,769 health nonprofits under $100k, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Phillip and Elizabeth Filmer Memoriallocal
- Numotion Foundationportfolio match
- The Baker Family Foundationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
94% of MARY AND CHARLES A PARKHILL FOUNDA FOR SPINAL CORD REHABILITATION’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (100% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
Who funds it, year by year
2019 → 2022: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $520 → $18k.
1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 97% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of MARY AND CHARLES A PARKHILL FOUNDA FOR SPINAL CORD REHABILITATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
MARY AND CHARLES A PARKHILL FOUNDA FOR SPINAL CORD REHABILITATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 97% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
97% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MARY AND CHARLES A PARKHILL FOUNDA FOR SPINAL CORD REHABILITATION.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2022 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
97% of MARY AND CHARLES A PARKHILL FOUNDA FOR SPINAL CORD REHABILITATION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $520 that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Michigan, across 1 state.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $18k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Phillip and Elizabeth Filmer MemoriallocalMI · funds 69 organizations near you
- Numotion Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Baker Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Ray Family Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Christopher Reeve Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Kw Beverage Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Fred J Maloof Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Never Better Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Camosse Family Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Frank & Victoria Rich Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Glenn Shaw Family Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Lois & Richard Nicotra Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like MARY AND CHARLES A PARKHILL FOUNDA FOR SPINAL CORD REHABILITATION
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Michigan
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
48%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MARY AND CHARLES A PARKHILL FOUNDA FOR SPINAL CORD REHABILITATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds MARY AND CHARLES A PARKHILL FOUNDA FOR SPINAL CORD REHABILITATION?
- MARY AND CHARLES A PARKHILL FOUNDA FOR SPINAL CORD REHABILITATION (Michigan) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $18,613 to it, the largest being Network for Good ($18,093). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 97% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does MARY AND CHARLES A PARKHILL FOUNDA FOR SPINAL CORD REHABILITATION have?
- IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $18,613 in grants to MARY AND CHARLES A PARKHILL FOUNDA FOR SPINAL CORD REHABILITATION.
- Who is the largest funder of MARY AND CHARLES A PARKHILL FOUNDA FOR SPINAL CORD REHABILITATION?
- Network for Good is the largest funder on record, with $18,093 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like MARY AND CHARLES A PARKHILL FOUNDA FOR SPINAL CORD REHABILITATION find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing