Skip to content

Tennessee · Nonprofit

Madison Haywood Developmental Services

Madison Haywood Developmental Services (Tennessee) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,621,920 to it, the largest being MCNAIRY COUNTY DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC ($1,518,867). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$26M
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$1.6M
Net assets
$14M
2/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 8%
01What it does

What Madison Haywood Developmental Services does

Mission

To provide opportunities for Tennesseans with disabilities by helping them acquire new skills, access services, and contribute to their home communities.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Adult and Medicaid Waiver Residential Services

    $15,662,200 spentof which $235,555 as grants$21,192,814 earned by the program
    86% of program spending
  2. Adult Day Services: Trains individuals to serve in work-related activities, as well as teaching and assisting with motor skill development and maintenance.

    $1,243,032 spentof which $18,695 as grants$3,810,204 earned by the program
    7% of program spending
  3. Family Support Services: Assists individuals who wish to live on their own but require assistance in their daily lives such as meal preparation, transportation, medical administration, and personal hygiene.

    $248,604 spentof which $3,739 as grants$228,731 earned by the program
    1% of program spending
  4. 4th Purpose: Personal Assistance

    $994,428 spentof which $14,956 as grants$899,188 earned by the program
    5% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $18,148,264.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($15M) Expenses 100 ($15M) Net assets 100 ($5.0M)2018 Revenue 100 ($15M) Expenses 102 ($15M) Net assets 100 ($5.0M)2019 Revenue 109 ($16M) Expenses 112 ($16M) Net assets 97 ($4.8M)2020 Revenue 139 ($21M) Expenses 123 ($18M) Net assets 153 ($7.6M)2021 Revenue 141 ($21M) Expenses 129 ($19M) Net assets 197 ($9.8M)2022 Revenue 148 ($22M) Expenses 141 ($20M) Net assets 227 ($11M)2023 Revenue 157 ($23M) Expenses 155 ($22M) Net assets 243 ($12M)2024 Revenue 165 ($24M) Expenses 164 ($24M) Net assets 255 ($13M)2025 Revenue 178 ($26M) Expenses 171 ($25M) Net assets 286 ($14M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (178)Expenses (171)Net assets (286)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $10M to $16M (+59%).

$10M
$10M
$10M
$16M
$16M
$15M
$20M
$20M
$21M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 0% · 2018 0% · 2019 0% · 2020 0% · 2021 15% · 2022 14%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

0% of Madison Haywood Developmental Services’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (21% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 3,400 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$270k
’17
$10k
’18
−$141k
’19
$2.7M
’20
$2.2M
’21
$1.5M
’22
$793k
’23
$600k
’24
$1.5M
’25
2.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

William Brewer

CEO

Board chair

Jimmy Duke

Chairman

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed111313131516151621
Joined·+2+0+0+2+2+1+1+5
No longer listed·00001200
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $19k → $20.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
total
funders
1
1
1
3
2
1
1

2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Madison Haywood Developmental Services’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Madison Haywood Developmental Services leans on a few funders — its largest provides 94% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Madison Haywood Developmental Services.

94%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 98% · 2021 99% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of Madison Haywood Developmental Services's grant income comes from Tennessee funders.

TN

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
Tennessee out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $5k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Madison Haywood Developmental Services runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 2,297 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin6% · above the median
Months of reserve2.7mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)7% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,297 human services nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Organizations like Madison Haywood Developmental Services

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Tennessee

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

73% of spending goes to programs.

Program 73%Management 27%Fundraising 0%

Governance

14
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

91%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

TN

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Madison Haywood Developmental Services: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Madison Haywood Developmental Services?
Madison Haywood Developmental Services (Tennessee) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,621,920 to it, the largest being MCNAIRY COUNTY DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC ($1,518,867). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Madison Haywood Developmental Services have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $1,621,920 in grants to Madison Haywood Developmental Services, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Madison Haywood Developmental Services?
MCNAIRY COUNTY DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES INC is the largest funder on record, with $1,518,867 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Madison Haywood Developmental Services find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Tennessee. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Madison Haywood Developmental Services →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing