Ohio · Nonprofit
LUCAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DRUG ABUSE RESPONSE TEAM INC
LUCAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DRUG ABUSE RESPONSE TEAM INC (Ohio) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $167,621 to it, the largest being TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ($67,304). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
LUCAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DRUG ABUSE RESPONSE TEAM INC runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 9,648 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,648 health nonprofits under $100k, FY2022
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- United Way of Greater Toledoshared funders
- Hope in the Hills Incorporated Healing Appalachiaportfolio match
- National Harm Reduction Coalitionportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
100% of LUCAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DRUG ABUSE RESPONSE TEAM INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
Who funds it, year by year
2018 → 2021: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $50k → $45k.
1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 40% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of LUCAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DRUG ABUSE RESPONSE TEAM INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
LUCAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DRUG ABUSE RESPONSE TEAM INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 40% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund LUCAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DRUG ABUSE RESPONSE TEAM INC.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 80% · 2019 62% · 2021 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of LUCAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DRUG ABUSE RESPONSE TEAM INC's grant income comes from Ohio funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $67k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 3 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- United Way of Greater Toledoshared fundersOH · backs 68 organizations that share your funders
- Hope in the Hills Incorporated Healing Appalachiaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Harm Reduction Coalitionportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Council on Problem Gambling Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directorsdba Nastadportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- David Meade Massie Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Roach Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Governors Highway Safety Associationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United Way of Lea County Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ohio Peer Recovery Organizations Ohio-Proportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Pact Coalition for Safe and Drug- Free Communitiesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Garrett Walker Joshua 1-9 Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like LUCAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DRUG ABUSE RESPONSE TEAM INC
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Ohio
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
87%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for LUCAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DRUG ABUSE RESPONSE TEAM INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds LUCAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DRUG ABUSE RESPONSE TEAM INC?
- LUCAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DRUG ABUSE RESPONSE TEAM INC (Ohio) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $167,621 to it, the largest being TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ($67,304). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does LUCAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DRUG ABUSE RESPONSE TEAM INC have?
- IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $167,621 in grants to LUCAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DRUG ABUSE RESPONSE TEAM INC, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of LUCAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DRUG ABUSE RESPONSE TEAM INC?
- TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $67,304 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like LUCAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S DRUG ABUSE RESPONSE TEAM INC find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ohio. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2017–2022), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing