Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

LILAC CITY LACROSSE CLUB

LILAC CITY LACROSSE CLUB (Washington) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $31 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($31). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2023
$217k
Funders on record
1
Grants received
$31
Net assets
$14k
1/1 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What Lilac City Lacrosse Club does

Mission

To promote the development and growth of the sport of lacrosse with area youth through skills enhancement, positive coaching to support character development and leadership skills, and to provide an atmosphere that will improve the personal resilience of participants.

As stated on its FY2023 Form 990.

Programs

  1. To provide funds to offer our lacrosse teams and team members not only the opportunity to compete competitively in the spokane area, but to instill leadership skills and positive self-esteem for the participants in our program.

    $109,750 spent$105,607 earned by the program
    50% of program spending
  2. To provide funds to attract superior coaches, who provide positive role models and who encourage team commitment, personal accountability, and respect for ones own accomplishments and those accomplishments of others on and off the field.

    $93,593 spent$93,652 earned by the program
    42% of program spending
  3. To provide funds to insure that direct administrative expenditures to manage and operate the lacrosse club program are allocated and paid to accomodate business activity.

    $18,134 spent$18,134 earned by the program
    8% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $221,477.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($53k) Expenses 100 ($59k) Net assets 100 ($9k)2019 Revenue 152 ($80k) Expenses 133 ($78k) Net assets 123 ($11k)2020 Revenue 150 ($79k) Expenses 138 ($81k) Net assets 100 ($9k)2021 Revenue 290 ($153k) Expenses 231 ($136k) Net assets 303 ($26k)2022 Revenue 272 ($143k) Expenses 254 ($149k) Net assets 236 ($20k)2023 Revenue 413 ($217k) Expenses 381 ($224k) Net assets 164 ($14k)
201820192020202120222023
Revenue (413)Expenses (381)Net assets (164)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $9k to $26k (+203%).

$9k
$11k
$9k
$26k
$20k
$14k
201820192020202120222023
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

0% of LILAC CITY LACROSSE CLUB’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (18% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 16,168 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

−$6k
’18
$2k
’19
−$2k
’20
$18k
’21
−$6k
’22
−$6k
’23
0.8
months of
reserve
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $5 → $16.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
total
funders
1
1
1
1

1 of 1 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of LILAC CITY LACROSSE CLUB’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of LILAC CITY LACROSSE CLUB's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $31 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

LILAC CITY LACROSSE CLUB has grown faster than three-quarters of the 14,564 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−3% · below the median
Months of reserve0.8mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)33% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 14,564 recreation & sports nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2023

Organizations like LILAC CITY LACROSSE CLUB

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

99% of spending goes to programs.

Program 99%Management 1%Fundraising 0%

Governance

4
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for LILAC CITY LACROSSE CLUB: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds LILAC CITY LACROSSE CLUB?
LILAC CITY LACROSSE CLUB (Washington) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $31 to it, the largest being AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION ($31). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does LILAC CITY LACROSSE CLUB have?
IRS filings report 1 organization giving $31 in grants to LILAC CITY LACROSSE CLUB, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of LILAC CITY LACROSSE CLUB?
AMAZONSMILE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $31 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like LILAC CITY LACROSSE CLUB find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Lilac City Lacrosse Club →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2018–2023), and the filings of 1 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing