Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

South Carolina · Nonprofit

LEXINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

LEXINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (South Carolina) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $59,000 to it, the largest being SC HEALTH COMPANY ($47,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$1.0M
Revenue FY2025
2
Funders on record
$59k
Grants received
$1.2M
Net assets
1/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 2%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($721k) Expenses 100 ($683k) Net assets 100 ($967k)2018 Revenue 97 ($703k) Expenses 108 ($740k) Net assets 96 ($930k)2019 Revenue 127 ($916k) Expenses 126 ($862k) Net assets 102 ($985k)2020 Revenue 102 ($739k) Expenses 112 ($765k) Net assets 99 ($959k)2021 Revenue 123 ($885k) Expenses 121 ($830k) Net assets 105 ($1.0M)2022 Revenue 133 ($963k) Expenses 130 ($889k) Net assets 113 ($1.1M)2023 Revenue 145 ($1.0M) Expenses 137 ($934k) Net assets 126 ($1.2M)2024 Revenue 154 ($1.1M) Expenses 157 ($1.1M) Net assets 130 ($1.3M)2025 Revenue 139 ($1.0M) Expenses 155 ($1.1M) Net assets 124 ($1.2M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (139)Expenses (155)Net assets (124)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 11%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$38k
17
$36k
18
$55k
19
$26k
20
$55k
21
$74k
22
$114k
23
$35k
24
$55k
25
7.6
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income held at $12k.

Funder
'17
'21
'23
'24*
total
funders
1
1
1
1

From the IRS filings of LEXINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.

How concentrated its funding is

LEXINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 80% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

80%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2021 100% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.

Where its funders are

100% of LEXINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE's grant income comes from South Carolina funders.

SC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
21
23
South Carolina out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like LEXINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In South Carolina

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Governance

27
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Doris Burkett Scholarship Fund Inc · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for LEXINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds LEXINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE?
LEXINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (South Carolina) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $59,000 to it, the largest being SC HEALTH COMPANY ($47,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does LEXINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $59,000 in grants to LEXINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of LEXINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE?
SC HEALTH COMPANY is the largest funder on record, with $47,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like LEXINGTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in South Carolina. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. What this page cannot tell you · view filing