Skip to content

Missouri · Nonprofit

KIRKWOOD BAND BOOSTERS

KIRKWOOD BAND BOOSTERS (Missouri) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $10,880 to it, the largest being POTTHOFF FAMILY FOUNDATION ($10,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$99k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$11k
Net assets
$86k
2/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 15%
01What it does

What Kirkwood Band Boosters does

Mission

To provide support to band music program of the kirkwood school district, grades 5-12

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. Student support: band uniform dry cleaning, performance tshirts, formal uniforms, shoes, lyres, camp supplies

    $63,618 spentof which $63,618 as grants
    78% of program spending
  2. Instruments & equipment

    $1,350 spentof which $1,350 as grants
    2% of program spending
  3. Performance support: accompanist, clinicians, audition fees, solo & ensemble fees, travel to state solo & ensemble

    $9,701 spentof which $9,701 as grants
    12% of program spending
  4. Director support: music, supplies, events, travel, software

    $2,759 spentof which $2,759 as grants
    3% of program spending
  5. Scholarships

    $2,680 spentof which $2,680 as grants
    3% of program spending
  6. Kikrwood band booster promotion & recognition

    $1,500 spentof which $1,500 as grants
    2% of program spending

The 6 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $81,608.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($79k) Expenses 100 ($49k) Net assets 100 ($106k)2018 Revenue 86 ($67k) Expenses 119 ($58k) Net assets 109 ($116k)2019 Revenue 74 ($58k) Expenses 122 ($60k) Net assets 107 ($114k)2020 Revenue 53 ($42k) Expenses 130 ($64k) Net assets 86 ($92k)2021 Revenue 44 ($34k) Expenses 135 ($67k) Net assets 56 ($59k)2022 Revenue 71 ($56k) Expenses 101 ($50k) Net assets 62 ($66k)2023 Revenue 64 ($50k) Expenses 145 ($71k) Net assets 42 ($45k)2024 Revenue 102 ($81k) Expenses 111 ($54k) Net assets 67 ($71k)2025 Revenue 126 ($99k) Expenses 172 ($84k) Net assets 80 ($86k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (126)Expenses (172)Net assets (80)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $92k to $59k (−35%).

$106k
$116k
$114k
$92k
$59k
$66k
$45k
$71k
$86k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

95% of KIRKWOOD BAND BOOSTERS’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (65% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 26,798 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$30k
’17
$9k
’18
−$2k
’19
−$22k
’20
−$32k
’21
$6k
’22
−$21k
’23
$26k
’24
$14k
’25
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $5k → $161.

Funder
'20
'21
'22
'23
total
funders
2
2
1
1

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 8% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of KIRKWOOD BAND BOOSTERS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

KIRKWOOD BAND BOOSTERS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 92% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

92%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 95% · 2021 95% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of KIRKWOOD BAND BOOSTERS's grant income comes from Missouri funders.

MO

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’21
Missouri out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $880 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

KIRKWOOD BAND BOOSTERS runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 17,277 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin15% · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)3% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 17,277 education nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Organizations like KIRKWOOD BAND BOOSTERS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Missouri

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for KIRKWOOD BAND BOOSTERS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds KIRKWOOD BAND BOOSTERS?
KIRKWOOD BAND BOOSTERS (Missouri) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $10,880 to it, the largest being POTTHOFF FAMILY FOUNDATION ($10,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does KIRKWOOD BAND BOOSTERS have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $10,880 in grants to KIRKWOOD BAND BOOSTERS, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of KIRKWOOD BAND BOOSTERS?
POTTHOFF FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $10,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like KIRKWOOD BAND BOOSTERS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Missouri. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Kirkwood Band Boosters →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing