Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Ohio · Nonprofit

KEYSTONE ATHLETIC TEAMS SUPPORTERS

KEYSTONE ATHLETIC TEAMS SUPPORTERS (Ohio) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $386,157 to it, the largest being AMVETS OF ELYRIA POST 32 ($286,157). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$261k
Revenue FY2025
2
Funders on record
$386k
Grants received
$320k
Net assets
2/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 50%

Against its field

KEYSTONE ATHLETIC TEAMS SUPPORTERS runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 9,643 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.

Operating margin74% · top quartile
Months of reserve55.9mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)34% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,643 recreation & sports nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($25k) Expenses 100 ($24k) Net assets 100 ($24k)2018 Revenue 271 ($69k) Expenses 177 ($42k) Net assets 214 ($51k)2019 Revenue 285 ($73k) Expenses 155 ($37k) Net assets 358 ($85k)2020 Revenue 275 ($70k) Expenses 150 ($36k) Net assets 496 ($118k)2021 Revenue 597 ($152k) Expenses 204 ($48k) Net assets 934 ($221k)2022 Revenue 516 ($131k) Expenses 89 ($21k) Net assets 1399 ($332k)2023 Revenue 1155 ($294k) Expenses 403 ($95k) Net assets 2238 ($530k)2024 Revenue 1012 ($257k) Expenses 2796 ($662k) Net assets 533 ($126k)2025 Revenue 1026 ($261k) Expenses 287 ($68k) Net assets 1348 ($320k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (1026)Expenses (287)Net assets (1348)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

2% of KEYSTONE ATHLETIC TEAMS SUPPORTERS’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (18% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 16,078 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$2k
17
$27k
18
$36k
19
$34k
20
$104k
21
$110k
22
$199k
23
$404k
24
$193k
25
56
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $9k → $89k.

Funder
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
$286k
funders
1
1
1
2
2
1
1

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)26% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of KEYSTONE ATHLETIC TEAMS SUPPORTERS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

KEYSTONE ATHLETIC TEAMS SUPPORTERS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 74% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund KEYSTONE ATHLETIC TEAMS SUPPORTERS.

74%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 61% · 2023 68%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of KEYSTONE ATHLETIC TEAMS SUPPORTERS's grant income comes from Ohio funders.

OH

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

19
20
21
22
23
Ohio out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $100k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like KEYSTONE ATHLETIC TEAMS SUPPORTERS

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ohio

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

97% of spending goes to programs.

Program 97%Management 3%Fundraising 0%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for KEYSTONE ATHLETIC TEAMS SUPPORTERS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds KEYSTONE ATHLETIC TEAMS SUPPORTERS?
KEYSTONE ATHLETIC TEAMS SUPPORTERS (Ohio) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $386,157 to it, the largest being AMVETS OF ELYRIA POST 32 ($286,157). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does KEYSTONE ATHLETIC TEAMS SUPPORTERS have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $386,157 in grants to KEYSTONE ATHLETIC TEAMS SUPPORTERS, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of KEYSTONE ATHLETIC TEAMS SUPPORTERS?
AMVETS OF ELYRIA POST 32 is the largest funder on record, with $286,157 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like KEYSTONE ATHLETIC TEAMS SUPPORTERS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ohio. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing