Loading…
Loading…
Alabama · Nonprofit
JACKSON HOSPITAL AND CLINIC INC (Alabama) is funded by 3 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $6,351,367 in grants to it, the largest being ALABAMA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ($4,661,993). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
JACKSON HOSPITAL AND CLINIC INC has grown faster than half of the 1,937 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,937 health nonprofits over $100M, FY2022
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
0% of JACKSON HOSPITAL AND CLINIC INC’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (1% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
$24k from 1 funders in 2024, up from $54k and 2 in 2018.
From the IRS filings of JACKSON HOSPITAL AND CLINIC INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
JACKSON HOSPITAL AND CLINIC INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 73% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 54% · 2019 100% · 2020 98% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 78% · 2024 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
JACKSON HOSPITAL AND CLINIC INC is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Alabama funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $103k on record — $100k federal, $3k state.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
86% of spending goes to programs.
Part of a family of 4 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2017–2022), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing