Illinois · Nonprofit
INSTITUTE FOR EXCELLENCE IN PUBLIC POLLING
INSTITUTE FOR EXCELLENCE IN PUBLIC POLLING (Illinois) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $300,000 to it, the largest being Schwab Charitable Fund ($300,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
Against its field
INSTITUTE FOR EXCELLENCE IN PUBLIC POLLING receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $300k to it.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,119 public benefit nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Illinois Action for Childrenlocal
- Foundation for Accountability Integrity & Research in Elections Fundportfolio match
- State Policy Networkportfolio match
Who funds it, year by year
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
1 of 1 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of INSTITUTE FOR EXCELLENCE IN PUBLIC POLLING’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of INSTITUTE FOR EXCELLENCE IN PUBLIC POLLING's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $300k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Illinois Action for ChildrenlocalIL · funds 237 organizations near you
- Foundation for Accountability Integrity & Research in Elections Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- State Policy Networkportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Roe Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Atlas Economic Research Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Holman Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Conservative Partnership Instituteportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Chase Foundation of Virginiaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- NetChoiceportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ending Spending Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Neal & Jane Freeman Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Woodford Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like INSTITUTE FOR EXCELLENCE IN PUBLIC POLLING
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Illinois
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INSTITUTE FOR EXCELLENCE IN PUBLIC POLLING: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR EXCELLENCE IN PUBLIC POLLING?
- INSTITUTE FOR EXCELLENCE IN PUBLIC POLLING (Illinois) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $300,000 to it, the largest being Schwab Charitable Fund ($300,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does INSTITUTE FOR EXCELLENCE IN PUBLIC POLLING have?
- IRS filings report 1 organization giving $300,000 in grants to INSTITUTE FOR EXCELLENCE IN PUBLIC POLLING, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of INSTITUTE FOR EXCELLENCE IN PUBLIC POLLING?
- Schwab Charitable Fund is the largest funder on record, with $300,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like INSTITUTE FOR EXCELLENCE IN PUBLIC POLLING find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Illinois. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2024–2024), and the filings of 1funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing