Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Maine · Nonprofit

Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts

Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts (Maine) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $185,000 to it, the largest being Schwab Charitable Fund ($75,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 68% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$2.8M
Revenue FY2025
3
Funders on record
$185k
Grants received
$2.4M
Net assets
3/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 3%

Against its field

Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 9,072 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin4% · above the median
Months of reserve2.2mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)8% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,072 education nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.5M) Expenses 100 ($1.4M) Net assets 100 ($396k)2018 Revenue 117 ($1.7M) Expenses 117 ($1.7M) Net assets 122 ($481k)2019 Revenue 182 ($2.7M) Expenses 117 ($1.7M) Net assets 389 ($1.5M)2020 Revenue 111 ($1.7M) Expenses 115 ($1.6M) Net assets 395 ($1.6M)2021 Revenue 119 ($1.8M) Expenses 116 ($1.6M) Net assets 467 ($1.8M)2022 Revenue 126 ($1.9M) Expenses 127 ($1.8M) Net assets 472 ($1.9M)2023 Revenue 163 ($2.4M) Expenses 167 ($2.4M) Net assets 499 ($2.0M)2024 Revenue 175 ($2.6M) Expenses 182 ($2.6M) Net assets 553 ($2.2M)2025 Revenue 189 ($2.8M) Expenses 192 ($2.7M) Net assets 605 ($2.4M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (189)Expenses (192)Net assets (605)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 6%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

2% of Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (48% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,312 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$77k
17
$85k
18
$1.1M
19
$26k
20
$143k
21
$89k
22
$70k
23
$38k
24
$107k
25
2.2
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $45k → $48k.

Funder
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
2
1
1
1
2
3
3

2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)68% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts leans on a few funders — its largest provides 41% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts.

41%
largest funder
100%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 67% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 57% · 2023 63%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

68% of Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $60k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Maine, across 1 state.

IN

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

18
19
20
21
22
23
Maine out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $125k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $524k on record.

Federal$524k
grants $524kcontracts $0
20
21
Top agencies
  • Department of Education$524k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Maine

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

77% of spending goes to programs.

Program 77%Management 17%Fundraising 6%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts?
Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts (Maine) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $185,000 to it, the largest being Schwab Charitable Fund ($75,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 68% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $185,000 in grants to Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts?
Schwab Charitable Fund is the largest funder on record, with $75,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Maine. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing