Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

Inner-City Filmmakers

Inner-City Filmmakers (California) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $868,800 to it, the largest being HOLLYWOOD FOREIGN PRESS ASSOCIATION CHARITABLE TRUST ($260,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$105k
Funders on record
8
Grants received
$869k
Net assets
$720k
5/8 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 98%
01What it does

What Inner-City Filmmakers does

Mission

Film career and job training for financially disadvantaged students.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. Film career and job training for financially disadvantaged students.

    $60,794 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $60,794.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($175k) Expenses 100 ($155k) Net assets 100 ($392k)2018 Revenue 152 ($265k) Expenses 124 ($191k) Net assets 119 ($466k)2019 Revenue 97 ($170k) Expenses 74 ($115k) Net assets 133 ($522k)2020 Revenue 67 ($118k) Expenses 138 ($213k) Net assets 109 ($426k)2021 Revenue 73 ($127k) Expenses 50 ($78k) Net assets 121 ($475k)2022 Revenue 92 ($161k) Expenses 61 ($94k) Net assets 138 ($542k)2023 Revenue 143 ($249k) Expenses 65 ($100k) Net assets 176 ($691k)2024 Revenue 60 ($105k) Expenses 49 ($76k) Net assets 184 ($720k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (60)Expenses (49)Net assets (184)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $542k to $691k (+28%).

$392k
$466k
$522k
$426k
$475k
$542k
$691k
$720k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

99% of Inner-City Filmmakers’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (54% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,338 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$20k
’17
$74k
’18
$55k
’19
−$96k
’20
$49k
’21
$67k
’22
$149k
’23
$29k
’24
114
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Rick Hess

Chairman

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

20182019202220232024
Listed1111121212
Joined·+0·+0+0
No longer listed·0·00
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 6 funders to 3 funders, grant income fell $155k → $55k.

From the IRS filings of Inner-City Filmmakers’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Inner-City Filmmakers leans on a few funders — its largest provides 30% of grant income and the top three 77%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

30%
largest funder
77%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 23% · 2018 25% · 2019 33% · 2020 35% · 2021 70% · 2022 75% · 2023 55% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

57% of Inner-City Filmmakers's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 63% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

100% of Inner-City Filmmakers's grant income comes from California funders.

CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Inner-City Filmmakers runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 2,276 employment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin28% · top quartile
Months of reserve113.7mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−7% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,276 employment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Organizations like Inner-City Filmmakers

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

80% of spending goes to programs.

Program 80%Management 20%Fundraising 0%

Governance

11
board members
100%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Inner-City Filmmakers: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Inner-City Filmmakers?
Inner-City Filmmakers (California) receives grants from 8 organizations whose IRS filings report $868,800 to it, the largest being HOLLYWOOD FOREIGN PRESS ASSOCIATION CHARITABLE TRUST ($260,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Inner-City Filmmakers have?
IRS filings report 8 organizations giving $868,800 in grants to Inner-City Filmmakers, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Inner-City Filmmakers?
HOLLYWOOD FOREIGN PRESS ASSOCIATION CHARITABLE TRUST is the largest funder on record, with $260,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Inner-City Filmmakers find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Inner-City Filmmakers →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 8 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing