Michigan · Nonprofit
ICE FASTPITCH
ICE FASTPITCH (Michigan) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,099 to it, the largest being THE WILLIAMSON FOUNDATION INC ($1,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2024
- $133k
- Funders on record
- 2
- Grants received
- $1k
- Net assets
- $2k
What Ice Fastpitch does
Mission
Fostering local regional national girls fastpitch softball
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ.
Programs
9U Klivak had 11 players and two coaches. They played in 10 tournaments as well as winter and summer leagues. The girls continued to learn fundamentals and the importance of team-first attitudes.
$10,489 spent8% of program spending10U Moore had 12 players and three coaches. The team played in 11 tournaments winning three and placing third or better in five others. The team continued working on fundamentals and developing good practice habits.
$12,751 spent10% of program spending11U Richardson had 11 players and two coaches playing in 11 tournaments three of them overnight events. The team was highly successful winning four tournaments and finishing second in four others. The team also played in a winter league.
$16,150 spent12% of program spending12U Pushman had 12 players and two coaches. They played in 8 tournaments winning two and finishing third or higher is two others. The team built on its fundamentals and continued to grow finishing over .500 for the season and retaining all players.
$17,613 spent13% of program spending13U Combs had 12 girls and four coaches. They played in 9 tournaments winning four and placing in the top four of two others. The team was known for competitiveness fair play and player development.
$22,777 spent17% of program spending14U Simpson had 11 players and two coaches. The team played in 10 tournaments including three overnight. The girls showed cohesiveness through some adversity but built on small successes and finished the year on a positive note.
$13,500 spent10% of program spending15U Gavlinski had 11 players and two coaches. The team played in 9 tournaments winning one and finishing third or higher in four others. The team was competitive developed well.
$13,572 spent10% of program spending18U Newbery had 10 players and two coaches. They played in 9 tournaments including several college exposure events. They won three tournaments and a number of girls on the team were college spots or scholarships.
$12,238 spent9% of program spending16U Martin had 11 players and three coaches. This team built on the lessons learned from some struggles the previous year and focused on cohesiveness and supporting each other. They played in 10 tournaments finishing third or higher in four and winning one. A strong team that built strong bonds.
$14,282 spent11% of program spending
The 9 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $133,372.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $2k to $2k (−32%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
100% of ICE FASTPITCH’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (18% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.
Who funds it, year by year
2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $23 → $25.
1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 9% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of ICE FASTPITCH’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
ICE FASTPITCH leans on a few funders — its largest provides 91% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of ICE FASTPITCH's grant income comes from Michigan funders.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $99 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
ICE FASTPITCH's funding has concentrated — grant income rose while the number of funders held roughly flat.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 15,520 recreation & sports nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Organizations like ICE FASTPITCH
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Michigan
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ICE FASTPITCH: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds ICE FASTPITCH?
- ICE FASTPITCH (Michigan) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,099 to it, the largest being THE WILLIAMSON FOUNDATION INC ($1,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does ICE FASTPITCH have?
- IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $1,099 in grants to ICE FASTPITCH, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of ICE FASTPITCH?
- THE WILLIAMSON FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $1,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like ICE FASTPITCH find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Ice Fastpitch →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2021–2024), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing