Loading…
Loading…
Arizona · Nonprofit
GREATER PHOENIX CENTER FOR JEWISH (Arizona) is funded by 8 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $459,097 in grants to it, the largest being ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($210,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
GREATER PHOENIX CENTER FOR JEWISH's revenue fell 96% between 2023 and 2024.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 14,240 human services nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 2 reported years ran a deficit.
$13k from 1 funders in 2025, up from $145k and 4 in 2023.
7 of 8 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of GREATER PHOENIX CENTER FOR JEWISH’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
GREATER PHOENIX CENTER FOR JEWISH leans on a few funders — its largest provides 46% of grant income and the top three 86%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2023 66% · 2024 70% · 2025 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
GREATER PHOENIX CENTER FOR JEWISH is locally rooted: 67% of its grant income comes from Arizona funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 8 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2023–2024), and the filings of 8funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing