Maryland · Nonprofit
GLOBAL PEACE FOUNDATION
GLOBAL PEACE FOUNDATION (Maryland) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,179,616 to it, the largest being UNITED VISION FOUNDATION ($4,882,592). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2024
- $11M
- Funders on record
- 5
- Grants received
- $5.2M
- Net assets
- $599k
What Global Peace Foundation does
Mission
Founded in 2009, Global Peace Foundation (gpf) works domestically and internationally to promote sustainable peace, social cohesion, and compassionate development. We believe a peaceful future is within our reach, and that our shared values and aspirations as members of the human family are the keys to realizing diversity, peace and prosperity. Gpf's innovative work includes community peacebuilding, violence prevention, and youth empowerment, women's leadership development, education and entrepreneurship, and volunteer service programming.
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.
Programs
On its FY2024 return the organization reported starting a significant new program.
Building on the strategic shift initiated in 2023, gpf further optimized its programming in 2024 to adapt to the post-pandemic environment, prioritizing more in-person events, programs, and convenings, while also maintaining hybrid online/in-person offerings and expanding our digital library of free peacebuilding content. Our approach continued to strategically aim towards re-engaging individuals in person, providing deeper, localized impact. Key initiatives that continued to grow and new programs that expanded their reach in 2024 include: global peace leadership corps: this international, cross-cultural peacebuilding and service program was further developed in 2024 to cultivate a new generation of young leaders grounded in global citizenship and peacebuilding. It engaged over 22,000 youth in 2024, with more than 20,000 participating in person across 10+ countries, supported by over 1,800 volunteers and 150+ community partners. The program offers leadership training and credentialing in peacebuilding, leadership development, alongside career and mentorship access, and opportunities for international exchanges and service learning. African renaissance initiative (ari): this multi-sector platform focused on transforming africa's youth demographic into a dividend by cultivating ethical leadership, youth empowerment, and cross-sector partnerships rooted in african values like ubuntu. In 2024, ari highlights included over 24,000 event participants, with more than 12,000…
Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 2).
Gpf asianortheast asia region:this region saw a continued focus on peace and stability on the korean peninsula and regional development: the korean dream art exhibition continued to provide a powerful space for empathy and shared vision related to the division of north and south korea, involving diverse artists and promoting a pan-national vision of peaceful reunification. Efforts to foster the idea of koreans as "one family" were sustained through events like the "k-family connecting north and south" initiative, which includes cultural expressions like arirang concerts. The north korean young leaders assembly continued for another year, gathering young escapees who represent a strong and unwavering cohort to promote change in north korea. They gathered in washington dc for sessions including a national security council and state department meeting, a meeting with the south korean ambassador, and roundtable discussions at the brookings institution. The international forum on one korea continued to be a crucial platform, engaging 500 participants in-person and online together with prominent experts, policymakers, journalists, and civil society leaders to build international support…
$2,766,579 spentof which $590,067 as grants$20,000 earned by the program29% of program spendingGpf americas region expense in the americas, gpf significantly invested in community safety, cross-community reconciliation, and leadership development: projects funded by the u.s. Department of homeland security, such as safe communities, safer youth, safer maryland campaign, and the behavioral threat assessment model project, continued to strengthen local capacity for preventing targeted violence and mass casualty events by training community members and youth-serving organizations to recognize risk factors. The baltimore cross-community engagement project and the montana cross-community engagement pilot continued to bridge divides and strengthen relationships between diverse communities, addressing racial discrimination and fostering empathy. Gpf continued its vital role in promoting international religious freedom, co-convening the annual washington d.c.-based international religious freedom summit and participating in numerous domestic and overseas ministerials and roundtables. In latin america, gpf continued to support the latin american presidential mission, an association of former heads of state dedicated to good governance, sustainable development, and social stability.…
$1,872,101 spentof which $549,570 as grants$326,350 earned by the program20% of program spendingSouth and southeast asia: this region saw substantial investment in youth empowerment, education, and community development: the global peace leadership corps activities were prominent, with the 12th global youth summit that gathered over 24,000 youth in pressing societal concerns related to un sustainable development goals. It covered 17 provinces across the philippines, culminating in the final event in manila. Five young leaders were awarded seed grants totaling p250,000 to support their sustainability projects. Youth volunteerism and service learning programs were actively implemented, including the peacebook library project, englished project, and greened (environmental teaching) project, fostering ecological responsibility among youth in indonesia, malaysia, philippines, and cambodia. The u-gen summit in indonesia continued to raise awareness about youth engagement in peace and development, involving hundreds of students from partner university campuses. The young bridging leaders challenge served as an international online workshop to raise youth peacebuilding capacity, engaging young leaders from multiple countries. In india, the global peace leadership conference…
$1,668,546 spentof which $983,963 as grants17% of program spendingAfrica:africa saw comprehensive efforts in youth empowerment, education, women's leadership, and environmental peacebuilding, often through the african renaissance initiative (ari). Over 800 volunteers, 300 expert facilitators, and 120 institutional partners supported ari's 2024 delivery: global peace leadership conference, nairobi, kenya engaged over 200 high level delegates including a high number of youth representatives, including faith leaders, educators, government officials and civil society leaders, as well as ngos from across the region. More than 50 sessions were facilitated including a regional roundtable briefing on preventing violent extremism. 60% of the delegates were youth representatives across the various conference tracks. In kenya, the great places to school program, a research-based rating system, continued to identify schools contributing to holistic child development, with the 3rd annual gala recognizing outstanding educators and schools. The transforming education summit explored integrating ethics and workplace skills into education, supported by the kenya ministry of education and other partners. The million tree growing campaign continued to combat…
$3,248,906 spentof which $1,306,980 as grants$18,147 earned by the program34% of program spending
The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $9,556,132.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $3.6M to $748k (−79%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2021 4% · 2022 4% · 2023 1% · 2024 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
100% of GLOBAL PEACE FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (96% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 4 funders, grant income rose $105k → $3.9M.
2 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 5% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of GLOBAL PEACE FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
GLOBAL PEACE FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 94% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 59% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 99% · 2021 97% · 2022 95% · 2023 99% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
GLOBAL PEACE FOUNDATION draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Maryland, across 3 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $269k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
GLOBAL PEACE FOUNDATION has grown faster than three-quarters of the 363 international nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 363 international nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024
Government funding GLOBAL PEACE FOUNDATION receives
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $1.3M on record.
- Department of Homeland Security$886k
- Department of Justice$400k
- Department of State$35k
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Organizations like GLOBAL PEACE FOUNDATION
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Maryland
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
92% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
42%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 3 states
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GLOBAL PEACE FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds GLOBAL PEACE FOUNDATION?
- GLOBAL PEACE FOUNDATION (Maryland) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $5,179,616 to it, the largest being UNITED VISION FOUNDATION ($4,882,592). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does GLOBAL PEACE FOUNDATION have?
- IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $5,179,616 in grants to GLOBAL PEACE FOUNDATION, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of GLOBAL PEACE FOUNDATION?
- UNITED VISION FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $4,882,592 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like GLOBAL PEACE FOUNDATION find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Maryland. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing