Georgia · Nonprofit
GEORGIA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION INC
GEORGIA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION INC (Georgia) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $400,010 to it, the largest being ATLANTA HAWKS FOUNDATION INC ($300,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
GEORGIA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION INC has grown faster than three-quarters of the 2,723 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,723 recreation & sports nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Vineyard Family Foundationlocal
- Environmental Fund for Georgia Incportfolio match
- Riverview Foundation Incportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2023 87% · 2024 76%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
88% of GEORGIA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (13% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2019 → 2021: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $100k → $5.
1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of GEORGIA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
GEORGIA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 75% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
75% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GEORGIA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION INC.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of GEORGIA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION INC's grant income comes from Georgia funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $10 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 3 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
- Vineyard Family FoundationlocalGA · funds 6 organizations near you
- Environmental Fund for Georgia Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Riverview Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Recreation and Park Associationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Sapelo Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Northside Hospital Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Robert W Woodruff Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Medlin-Hale Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Georgia Association of Realtors Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Frederick Bliss Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Nell & William Elkin Mem Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Alabama Association of Resource Conservation and Development Councilsportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like GEORGIA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION INC
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Georgia
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
63% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
98%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GEORGIA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds GEORGIA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION INC?
- GEORGIA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION INC (Georgia) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $400,010 to it, the largest being ATLANTA HAWKS FOUNDATION INC ($300,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does GEORGIA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION INC have?
- IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $400,010 in grants to GEORGIA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION INC, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of GEORGIA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION INC?
- ATLANTA HAWKS FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $300,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like GEORGIA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION INC find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Georgia. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing