Loading…
Loading…
Delaware · Nonprofit
FRIENDS OF HOCKESSIN COLORED SCHOOL 107 (Delaware) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $350,000 in grants to it, the largest being LONGWOOD FOUNDATION INC ($250,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
FRIENDS OF HOCKESSIN COLORED SCHOOL 107 runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 2,947 public benefit nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,947 public benefit nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
100% of FRIENDS OF HOCKESSIN COLORED SCHOOL 107’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (74% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
From the IRS filings of FRIENDS OF HOCKESSIN COLORED SCHOOL 107’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
FRIENDS OF HOCKESSIN COLORED SCHOOL 107 leans on a few funders — its largest provides 71% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
FRIENDS OF HOCKESSIN COLORED SCHOOL 107 is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Delaware funders.
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 2 funders put you under-funded among the 313 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $2.1M on record — $750k federal, $1.3M state.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
0% of spending goes to programs.
99%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2022–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing