Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

FRIENDS OF CTWC

FRIENDS OF CTWC (Texas) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $70,750 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($24,500). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 53% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$101k
Funders on record
4
Grants received
$71k
Net assets
$150k
3/4 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 43%
01What it does

What Friends of Ctwc does

Mission

Non profit research and education awareness and needed improvements in water policy and water management.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. Promote education on water issues: held public town hall meetings and spoke to various groups with the goal of education of water issues concerning the need for revisions for a more responsible and protective water management plan and conservation by all users tohelp protect the highland lakes as the region's water supply, given thetrend of much lower inflows. Worked within texas regional water planning process to add a recommendation into the regional water plan to provide programs and funding for waterrelated education of the public.

    $50,213 spent
    64% of program spending
  2. Legal: support and open records requests, analysis of current water sale contracts & policies. Support for preparation of inputs to state regulatory agencies ie: lcra, tceq, twdb on numerous matters such as the current lcra water management plan and 2032 update, drought of record process, drought contingency plans, regulatory agency rules and guidelines, and the regional water planning process. Review of educational materials, reduced water supply issues.

    $20,000 spent
    26% of program spending
  3. Scientific research: given the trend of lower inflows and their adverse impact on water supply for the region, conducted scientific studies of inflows, annual rainfall over the watershed for the full period of record, and productivity of the watershed and overall water balance of the lower colorado river basin and associated firm yields from the highland lakes, and overall system, including new reservoirs. Research indicates that drought of 1950s rainfall pattern should be considered the controlling drought for planning purposes, which is counter to current water planning. Recommended to regional water planning group to incorporate research into their planning.

    $7,962 spent
    10% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $78,175.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($56k) Expenses 100 ($67k) Net assets 100 ($59k)2018 Revenue 74 ($42k) Expenses 97 ($65k) Net assets 60 ($35k)2019 Revenue 60 ($34k) Expenses 49 ($33k) Net assets 62 ($36k)2020 Revenue 48 ($27k) Expenses 43 ($29k) Net assets 60 ($35k)2021 Revenue 50 ($28k) Expenses 30 ($20k) Net assets 75 ($44k)2022 Revenue 106 ($60k) Expenses 66 ($44k) Net assets 102 ($60k)2023 Revenue 103 ($58k) Expenses 52 ($35k) Net assets 141 ($83k)2024 Revenue 126 ($71k) Expenses 31 ($21k) Net assets 226 ($133k)2025 Revenue 180 ($101k) Expenses 125 ($84k) Net assets 256 ($150k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (180)Expenses (125)Net assets (256)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $83k to $133k (+60%).

$59k
$37k
$37k
$35k
$44k
$60k
$83k
$133k
$150k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of FRIENDS OF CTWC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,629 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$11k
’17
−$23k
’18
$849
’19
−$2k
’20
$9k
’21
$16k
’22
$23k
’23
$50k
’24
$17k
’25

Leadership and staff

Chief executive

Shannon Hamilton

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2022: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $5k → $26k.

2 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 53% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of FRIENDS OF CTWC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

FRIENDS OF CTWC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 35% of grant income and the top three 86%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

53% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund FRIENDS OF CTWC.

35%
largest funder
86%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 38% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

53% of FRIENDS OF CTWC's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $33k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Texas funders.

TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’21
’22
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $38k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

FRIENDS OF CTWC runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 2,433 environment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin17% · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)8% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,433 environment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like FRIENDS OF CTWC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

72%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for FRIENDS OF CTWC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds FRIENDS OF CTWC?
FRIENDS OF CTWC (Texas) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $70,750 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($24,500). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 53% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does FRIENDS OF CTWC have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $70,750 in grants to FRIENDS OF CTWC, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of FRIENDS OF CTWC?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $24,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like FRIENDS OF CTWC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Friends of Ctwc →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing