California · Nonprofit
Friends of Animal Services
Friends of Animal Services (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $644,000 to it, the largest being SHIRLEY PERRY FOUNDATION CO ROBERT J SEHR JR ($636,634). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Friends of Animal Services holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 80 animals nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 80 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2026
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- White Pony Expresslocal
- On Shore Foundationportfolio match
- Atlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Incportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
96% of Friends of Animal Services’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (86% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 10 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $48k → $64k.
2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Friends of Animal Services’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
Friends of Animal Services leans on a few funders — its largest provides 99% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Friends of Animal Services.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 99% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
Friends of Animal Services draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 1 state in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $7k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- White Pony ExpresslocalCA · funds 145 organizations near you
- On Shore Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Atlanta Humane Society & Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Crystal Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- George F and Helen M Hirschmann Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Max Goldenson Foundation for Modern Dog Adoptionportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Dr Jane's Healthypetnet Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Mary Jo and Hank Greenberg Animal Welfare Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Wings of Rescue Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Petsmart Charities Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Anthony & Trissa Napoleon Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Friends of Front Street Shelterportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like Friends of Animal Services
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
100% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Friends of Animal Services: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds Friends of Animal Services?
- Friends of Animal Services (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $644,000 to it, the largest being SHIRLEY PERRY FOUNDATION CO ROBERT J SEHR JR ($636,634). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does Friends of Animal Services have?
- IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $644,000 in grants to Friends of Animal Services, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of Friends of Animal Services?
- SHIRLEY PERRY FOUNDATION CO ROBERT J SEHR JR is the largest funder on record, with $636,634 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like Friends of Animal Services find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2026 (financials across 2017–2026), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing